Allcare the FTC and Public Policy Considerations Case Study

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 838 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 3

AllCare

The FTC and Public Policy Considerations against Anti-Competitive Behavior

The objective of this work is to discuss the role of the FTC and the public policy considerations against anti-competitive behavior and explain why the conduct of the IPAMG was deemed as anti-competitive behavior by the Federal Trade Commission. Finally, this work will identify the penalty, discuss whether that penalty was fair, and state why it is held to be either fair or unfair.

AllCare is described as a "multi-specialty independent practice association consisting of multiple, independent medical practices" and is stated to be comprised of 500 physician members with 200 of those physicians devoted to primary care in the area of Modesto, California. AllCare is reported to contract with Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs) to provide fee-for-service medical care. It was alleged in a complaint to the FTC that AllCare had "acted to restrain competition on fee-for-service contracts." (Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 2 / Monday, January 5, 2009)

I. Role of the FTC and Public Policy Considerations

AllCare was accused to acting to "…restrain competition on fee-for-service contracts by, among other things, facilitating, entering into, and implementing agreements, express or implied, to fix the prices and other terms at which they would contract with payors to engage in collective negotiations over terms and conditions of dealing with payors; and to have AllCare members refrain from negotiating individually with payors or contracting on terms other than those approved by AllCare.

Stuck Writing Your "Allcare the FTC and Public Policy Considerations" Case Study?

View All Our Example Allcare the FTC and Public Policy Considerations Case Study

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

" (Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 2 / Monday, January 5, 2009) The Complaint stated that AllCare had:

(1) Unreasonably restrained pricing and other forms of competition among physicians who are members of AllCare;

(2) increased prices for physician services;

(3) Depriving payors, including insurers and employers, and individual consumers, of the benefits of competition among physicians; and (4) Deprived consumers of the benefits of competition among payors. (Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 2 / Monday, January 5, 2009)

It was held that the "combination, conspiracy, acts and practices" described in the complaint "constitute unfair methods of competition in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended 15 U.S.C. Section 45." (Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 2 / Monday, January 5, 2009)

II. Explanation of the Conduct of the IPAMG

It is reported that the consent matter in this issue "settled alleged violations of federal law prohibiting deceptive acts of practices or unfair methods of competition." (Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 2 / Monday, January 5, 2009) The IPAMG had interfered….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Allcare The FTC And Public Policy Considerations" (2011, January 21) Retrieved May 18, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/allcare-ftc-public-policy-considerations-121726

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Allcare The FTC And Public Policy Considerations" 21 January 2011. Web.18 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/allcare-ftc-public-policy-considerations-121726>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Allcare The FTC And Public Policy Considerations", 21 January 2011, Accessed.18 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/allcare-ftc-public-policy-considerations-121726
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example