Ambrose/Plagiarism Purdue University's Online Writing Article Review

Total Length: 399 words ( 1 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Ambrose does not use his own words and his own voice in these instances, for the writing still parallels too closely that of the original. In some cases, Ambrose's wording is identical. It is an egregious offence for a writer of Ambrose's caliber and reputation. It is difficult to imagine that Ambrose did not understand what he was doing or comprehend the serious nature of his actions.

According to an article in The Weekly Standard, Childers was gracious about Ambrose's copy-catting, remarking only that he was "disappointed" (Barnes, 2002).

Stuck Writing Your "Ambrose/Plagiarism Purdue University's Online Writing" Article Review?

There were no comments from Ambrose reported, only a bit of side-stepping from his publisher, who praised Ambrose's work and insisted that all resources were appropriately documented. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Ambrose clearly plagiarized the work of Thomas Childers and, in so doing, forever tarnished his reputation as one of the nation's premier historians and writers......

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ambrose Plagiarism Purdue University's Online Writing" (2013, March 27) Retrieved June 28, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/ambrose-plagiarism-purdue-university-online-87010

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ambrose Plagiarism Purdue University's Online Writing" 27 March 2013. Web.28 June. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/ambrose-plagiarism-purdue-university-online-87010>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ambrose Plagiarism Purdue University's Online Writing", 27 March 2013, Accessed.28 June. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/ambrose-plagiarism-purdue-university-online-87010