Analyst and Policymakers Relationship Essay

Total Length: 1387 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 5

Page 1 of 5

Identify the analysts and the policymakers

It is not possible for one individual to collate and possess all necessary information required to make good decisions regarding national security and foreign policy issues. Indeed, the higher up one goes up the hierarchy of policy making ladder, the more complicated it becomes. Therefore, senior policy officials rely on their juniors and others for information and proper processing of the same[footnoteRef:1]. In effect, in such countries as the US, it means that such senior officials cannot afford to ignore advice from the US intelligence fraternity. [1: Ford, Relations between Intelligence Analysts and Policymakers]

Unlike information, intelligence is a filtered form that is responsive to stated needs and specified policy requirements. The intelligence community members are experts charged with the responsibility to analyze relevant data. Information is converted to intelligence by linking it to specific issues of national security importance; hence infusing it with value. The intelligence bodies serve various clients including the president, the Security Council, law enforcers, officials in government departments, and military commanders[footnoteRef:2]. [2: Davis, Tensions in analyst-policymaker relations]

“Policy makers” is the name given to people who have contested electoral positions and won. They are the ones that set budgets and govern. They also order operations and make important decisions. Policy makers benefit from intelligence service[footnoteRef:3]. While intelligence is a crucial component of the policy making process, its application should be determined by the policy maker. [3: Lowenthal, The policymaker-intelligence relationship]

Why is this relationship so important?

Products of intelligence should be tailored to support better decision making and strategy creation. Hence, a good relationship between intelligence analysts and policy makers cannot be overemphasized. Policy makers must trust the analysts in deciding which information is redundant and which one is helpful in the national security pursuits. Corporation between the two groups is necessary for compliance and understanding. It is the role of analysts to instill trust and confidence in the policy makers while keeping it objective[footnoteRef:4].
It is also important that policy makers and analysts, alike, express their requirements while keeping a keen eye on objectivity. They must not let their personal views interfere with the truth of the intelligence. [4: Gookins, The role of intelligence in policy making, 65-73]

Value is accorded to the information gathered by the intelligence analyst by linking it to national security issues. The products play an important role on the knowledge set needed to fulfill objectives at national level. They range from tactical aspects to strategic realms. Time frames are important factors in the categorization of intelligence. In intelligence circles, tactical data is regarded more urgent and crucial. Long term issues are addressed in strategic intelligence. They incorporate economic and political patterns and factors spreading over time[footnoteRef:5]. [5: LORNE, The Impact of the Information Revolution]

To maintain its relevance to the process of policy making, the intelligence community must generate expert input that the policy makers lack. In such an age of information accessibility by the wider public, analysts must add value to the information they share. Analysts add value by, among other things, establishing the credibility of the sources and giving the context. By doing so, analysts clarify information further[footnoteRef:6]. Apart from knowledge depth infused in conventional matters, an intelligence analyst delves beyond the political and even economic aspects and explores emerging issues that may not be conventional or traditional such as arms proliferation, crime and terrorism. The latter aspects are clear distinguishing points of the intelligence community in their analysis. [6: Ibid]

What are its flaws?

The available literature on intelligence shows that there are at least three key challenges with regard to the analytic purpose of intelligence. One of them has to do with the information age. The information age has broadened the body of information to be analyzed by the intelligence community; hence complicating analysis. The second challenge has to do with mindsets. Biased mindsets interfere….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Analyst And Policymakers Relationship" (2018, January 26) Retrieved May 17, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/analyst-policymakers-relationship-2166924

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Analyst And Policymakers Relationship" 26 January 2018. Web.17 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/analyst-policymakers-relationship-2166924>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Analyst And Policymakers Relationship", 26 January 2018, Accessed.17 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/analyst-policymakers-relationship-2166924