Autonomy Guarantee a Person Harmful Oneself? To Essay

Total Length: 699 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 4

Page 1 of 2

autonomy guarantee a person harmful oneself? To ? Explain response ethical rationale. Part the principle of autonomy certainly does not grant an individual the right to harm others. Autonomy may be one of the most fundamental aspects of free will, or is better thought of as the ultimate expression of free will since it is not hampered. However, the autonomous exercise of that free will only exists within the context of other ethical considerations. In particular, Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative is an ethical principle that explicitly denotes that autonomy does not permit the harming of others. Kant's categorical imperative is the belief that there are certain actions or deeds that are innately moral, and that must be followed (Guthrie, 2008). Conversely, there are also some actions and deeds that are fundamentally immoral, and should never be engaged in. This concept relates to the notion that people should not inflict others as an exercise of autonomy because one of the most quintessential examples of a categorical imperative is the proverbial golden rule: that one should do unto others as one wants done unto oneself (Klempner, 2007).

Stuck Writing Your "Autonomy Guarantee a Person Harmful Oneself? To" Essay?

Ergo, it is not a proper application of autonomy to harm others because of inherent ethical restrictions in the matter (Hirst, 1934, p. 328).

Additionally, it is well noted that autonomy does not automatically guarantee someone the right to harm oneself. From a strictly theoretical perspective, however, such a practice or proclivity is acceptable and well in the means of autonomy. However, one also must consider the relationships that people have with one another, specifically those in which there are individuals who are dependent upon others. Dependency can take several different forms, from children who are dependent upon parents for food clothing and shelter, to executives who are dependent upon executives and corporations for retirement and benefits packages, as well as salaries. In these cases, it is not acceptable for the individuals who have dependents to wantonly harm themselves, since doing so would ultimately affect others.

There is actually quite a substantial bit of difference between beneficence and non-maleficence. Beneficence is a….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Autonomy Guarantee A Person Harmful Oneself To" (2013, June 19) Retrieved June 5, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/autonomy-guarantee-person-harmful-oneself-92220

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Autonomy Guarantee A Person Harmful Oneself To" 19 June 2013. Web.5 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/autonomy-guarantee-person-harmful-oneself-92220>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Autonomy Guarantee A Person Harmful Oneself To", 19 June 2013, Accessed.5 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/autonomy-guarantee-person-harmful-oneself-92220