Bartleby the Scrivener Analysis Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 3557 words ( 12 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 12

Abstract



This article provides an example of a Bartleby the scrivener analysis essay.  It begins with an introduction, which is followed by a brief but detailed summary of the plot of the story.  A short analysis of the story is then provided, with emphasis placed on the theme of determinism vs. free will.  Bartleby is shown as one who is despairingly opposed to the deterministic notions of Calvinism, ingrained in the world around him.  The narrator is shown as one who is baffled by Bartleby’s bold but innocuous assertions while nonetheless drawn into secret sympathy and empathy with Bartleby’s plight.  Main characters, themes and a conclusion follow.

Bartleby the Scrivener Analysis Essay

Introduction



Herman Melville published “Bartleby the Scrivener:  A Story of Wall Street” in 1853.  It marked the beginning of his decline as a “respected” American writer.  Actually, his previous novel—Pierre; or, The Ambiguities—precipitated the decline of his literary reputation (already initiated by Moby-Dick, published in 1851).  Melville’s own frustration with his reading public (and the publishing houses that deemed his style and subjects too odd and too metaphysical) boiled over in Pierre.  “Bartleby” was an attempt to examine the preoccupations of Melville’s own mind in a more light-hearted, semi-satirical manner while still retaining the robust indignation that the author felt most keenly towards the limitations of the Calvinist doctrines that had informed New England society.  Melville had thoroughly hunted down and destroyed these doctrines in Moby-Dick.  “Bartleby” was an exercise in addressing these doctrines as manifested in the rise of the world of finance and the question of the human spirit in a society totally consumed by legalities, materialistic conquest, and determinism.

Summary



“Bartleby, the Scrivener:  A Story of Wall Street” is, in fact, more than just a story of Wall Street.  It is a story of the utterly incomprehensible mystery of free will and the extent to which one may assert one’s will in this world.  The narrator of the story is an unnamed but erudite observer of human nature.  He is a lawyer who runs a small firm on Wall Street in the 19th century, when American society was transitioning from being a rough-and-tumble, untamed country to a country of finance.  Indeed, Melville alludes to the rise of materialistic pursuit as the American ideal when he mentions John Jacob Astor, “a name which, I admit, I love to repeat, for it hath a rounded and orbicular sound to it, and rings like unto bullion” (Melville, 1853).  His descriptions of his two law clerks, Turkey and Nippers, are testaments to his powers of astuteness, and the narrator’s humble demeanor, general passivity, and dignified bearing mark him as one who has spent time both successfully managing his own business and managing his own personal habits so that none could accuse him of being unrefined or lacking in decorum.

Bartleby arrives and, of course, changes everything.

Bartleby responds to an ad placed by the narrator, who is looking for an extra copyist to help in the firm.  The narrator is initially greatly impressed and pleased with Bartleby’s aptitude for working at long stretches without complaint.  His new hire is rather singular, however, in the fact that he has no easily identifiable characteristics that would mark him as a flawed human being:  he has not Turkey’s weakness for the bottle, nor Nippers’ fiery temper; he is, instead, sedate, staid, and somewhat aloof to the goings-on of his environment.  In all aspects, he is, therefore, the ideal candidate for the position of law copyist on Wall Street.  He is almost like an inhuman automaton, whose sole function is to serve as a scrivener.

Then one day, Bartleby decides to assert his humanity with five little words:  “I would prefer not to.”

Bartleby’s response is to a summons from the narrator to compare a copy with the other clerks, a common practice.  His assertion—his preference—is what so badly sabotages the narrator’s hitherto perfect equanimity and the humming-along office.  At first, the narrator is simply stunned.  But as Bartleby’s attitude turns into obstinacy, his defiance becoming more and more pronounced—and problematic—the narrator undergoes such psychological and physical strain that he is literally beside himself over what to do about Bartleby, who prefers neither to work any longer as a copyist…nor to vacate the premises.  The narrator, meanwhile, struggles to come up with ways either to motivate Bartleby or to get him to see the absurdity of his situation and begin to act more rationally as a law copyist on Wall Street should. 

Bartleby, meanwhile, is unmoved by the narrator’s overtures, refuses all work, and begins squatting in the law firm, preferring even to remain there through the night as though it were his home.  From morning till evening, he sits in his quiet “hermitage” in a “dead-wall reverie,” as the narrator puts it—motionless and devoid of any interest in communicating with the world around him or engaging in any sort of redeeming activity whatsoever.  The narrator alternates between fits of outrage and calm, mild-mannered expressions of sympathy.  He is continuously perplexed by Bartleby’s increasing detachment from all things and torn between wanting to demonstrate Christian charity towards Bartleby and allow him to stay in his office as a permanent fixture and wanting to demonstrate a kind of tough love (he can’t help him unless Bartley helps himself) by evicting him from the premises for his passivity and his refusal to work.  In the end, however, Bartleby becomes such a distraction for the narrator’s associates (who begin to mock the narrator for putting up with the odd clerk) that the lawyer finally decides that in order to save face among his associates he himself must move—and so he relocates his firm to a new set of lodgings, leaving Bartleby behind.

The narrator, having moved his offices, momentarily feels freed of Bartleby and comforts his conscience by indicating that he has done all that could reasonably be expected of a man predisposed to doing only good to his fellow human beings.  Then he receives a call from the new tenant of the offices he has quit—a call about a young man who is squatting on the steps and will not move.  It is, of course, a reference to Bartleby, who continues to haunt the premises.  The narrator affirms that he has no connection to the individual.  The caller thanks him and informs him that there is therefore nothing to do but call the police.  Bartleby is promptly arrested.

The narrator’s conscience then begins to gnaw at him.  He questions himself:  had he really done all he could to help Bartleby?  Even when Bartleby had refused to take his advice, had he in some way abandoned the young man by moving his offices?  Did he owe Bartleby some kind of shelter, some kind of support?  Had he neglected to do his Christian duty by Bartleby?  How reasonably far could he go to sustain the young man in what could only be described as a state of utter despair?

Plagued by these questions, the narrator heads to the prison.

Stuck Writing Your "Bartleby the Scrivener Analysis " Essay?

View All Our Example Bartleby the Scrivener Analysis Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

  He finds Bartleby in one of his dead-wall reveries, turned, facing the wall of the prison yard and looking at nothing else, motionless—ignorant of the world and his environment.  Inquiring of a guard as to the state of Bartleby’s existence in the prison, the guard informs the narrator that Bartleby does nothing all day but stare at the wall—he does not move, eat or drink.  The narrator gives the guard some money and begs him to take care of Bartleby, and leaves. 

But even this fails to quiet the lawyer’s conscience.  He returns again a few days later.  This time, Bartleby is lying on the ground—the guard thinks he is sleeping, but upon the lawyer’s inspection it is clear that Bartleby is in fact dead.  The narrator alludes to the dignity of Bartleby’s soul by affirming that deceased now sleeps “with kings and counselors.”

A brief epilogue follows, in which the lawyer comes randomly into possession of a small detail on Bartleby’s back story from a time before the young clerk came to be employed in the lawyer’s offices.  Describing it only as a rumor, the narrator states that Bartleby was said to have been a clerk in the Dead Letter Office in Washington—the place where undeliverable letters and parcels are consigned to the flames, as the individual to whom they had been addressed had moved to whereabouts unknown or died before delivery could be accomplished.  The lawyer laments the office and the untold horror of it (as well as Bartleby’s dismissal from the place following a change in administration), and concludes with these words:  “On errands of life, these letters speed to death.  Ah Bartleby!  Ah humanity!”

Analysis



According to Tally, Jr. (2009), “the characteristic [Bartleby] radiates is darkness rather than light” (p. 2).  In other words, Bartleby is a problematic character whose purpose in the story is to pose a problematic phenomenon to the narrator and the reader.  That problem is despair.  Despair is the quality of lacking hope.  In religious terms, despair is characterized as the giving up of hope in one’s salvation or resignation to the belief that one cannot be saved or enjoy eternal happiness with God in Heaven.  The religious definition is particularly relevant in Bartleby as the character, like Melville himself, must be viewed as one who (whether he knows it consciously or not) is particularly troubled by the role that free will plays in the Protestant religious experience, which centers so much on the concept of predestination—the idea that one is saved or damned regardless of one’s will.  In 19th century New England Calvinist society, God chooses who will be of the elect; one does not get to choose of his own free will.

Bartleby represents a negative reaction to such a worldview:  he is a character who continuously asserts his own free will by saying, “I would prefer not to,” to the various requests made of him.  In effect, he is refusing to participate in a world where his choice is meaningless.  If, ultimately (i.e., at the metaphysical level), according to Protestant theory, one cannot choose to be with God of his own free will if God has not already chosen him, there is no point in doing anything.  Life is meaningless.  Salvation is arbitrarily designated by a God who cares not for the creatures he has created.  Bartleby plays along, following the rules, writing out the laws—until finally he has had enough.  His time in the Dead Letter Office (a place that represents the prayers and petitions of those seeking intervention from the Almighty, if the theme of free will within a religious paradigm is to be followed to its utmost logical application) prior to his employment in the law office (a place that represents the arbitrary, legalistic constructs of the Calvinistic, New England Protestant ethos) serves as the philosophical and theological prelude to Bartleby’s final refusal to participate.  He is, in effect, saying that the system is rigged:  only the elites—the elect—the “chosen”—can have hope.  And they, seemingly, are the ones who rule the roost—the successful tribe of Wall Street.  Bartleby resigns his commission and the narrator—like Ishmael at the end of Moby-Dick—alone survives to tell the tale.

Stempel and Stillians (1972) suggest that Melville’s Bartleby represents all the morbid characteristics of Matthew Arnold’s Empedocles on Etna. ….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Bartleby The Scrivener Analysis " (2018, July 26) Retrieved July 1, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/bartleby-scrivener-analysis-2167217

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Bartleby The Scrivener Analysis " 26 July 2018. Web.1 July. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/bartleby-scrivener-analysis-2167217>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Bartleby The Scrivener Analysis ", 26 July 2018, Accessed.1 July. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/bartleby-scrivener-analysis-2167217
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example