Berghuis V. Thompkins Throughout the Research Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1871 words ( 6 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 6

Page 1 of 6

Under U.S. v. Butler, the courts can make interpretations as to if a suspect has invoked these rights based upon their reactions to the questions and body language they are using. ("Berghuis v. Thompkins" 2009) ("Berghuis v. Thompkins," 2012) ("Miranda v. Arizona," 1966) (Dempsey, 2010)

In real world situations, this means that the basic rights are continually evolving based upon the questions and answers that are provided to law enforcement. The moment the suspect does not say anything, is the point when implied protections are being utilized. Once they begin answering questions is when they will have revoked these protections. This is because they decided to respond to one question. The fact that they chose to do this, is illustrating that the individual knows what is happening to them and is fully aware of their surroundings. As a result, any kind of information they provide can be used as evidence against them in a court of law. ("Berghuis v. Thompkins" 2009) ("Berghuis v.

Stuck Writing Your "Berghuis V. Thompkins Throughout The" Research Paper?

View All Our Example Berghuis V. Thompkins Throughout the Research Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Thompkins," 2012) ("Miranda v. Arizona," 1966) (Dempsey, 2010)

Conclusion

Clearly, the Berghuis v. Thompkins decision will have a lasting impact on the way the police question criminal suspects. This is because there was confusion about when a suspect is invoking and rejecting their constitutional rights through non-verbal cues. In the past, the court determined that when this occurs there are implied protections which are in place. According to Butler v. United States, this is based upon non-verbal signals the defendant is providing.

When they answer one question, the individual has waived these rights. This means that the police can use any information collected as evidence against the suspect. The reason why, is because they clearly know what is happening and have changed their mind during the course of the interview. This is illustrating how these protections are continually evolving from the suspects reactions during the interview......

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Berghuis V Thompkins Throughout The" (2013, January 28) Retrieved July 2, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/berghuis-thompkins-throughout-85523

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Berghuis V Thompkins Throughout The" 28 January 2013. Web.2 July. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/berghuis-thompkins-throughout-85523>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Berghuis V Thompkins Throughout The", 28 January 2013, Accessed.2 July. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/berghuis-thompkins-throughout-85523
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example