Case Brief of Giles V Commonwealth Case Study

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 687 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 2

4Giles v. CommonwealthCite as 672 S.E. 2d 879 (Va. 2009)Facts of CaseDefendant, Christopher Lee Giles, took part in breaking and entering a house on September 28, 2005, in the City of Martinsville. The house belonged to Oscar Thornton, which was an inheritance from his deceased mother three months before. While Mr. Thornton has his primary home in Maryland, he treated the house he inherited from his mother as a vacation home. Since inheriting it, Mr. Thornton has visited the home twice a month. Prior to the break-in, Mr. Thornton had stayed a whole weekend in the house ten days before. Mr. Thornton’s vacation home was a fully-furnished residence with fully-stocked food and sleeping quarters. During the break-in, Giles took food, sheets, towels, a videocassette recorder, two TV screens, and bathroom supplies.While Giles’ involvement in the break-in is not in dispute, he moved to strike arguing that the Commonwealth failed to ascertain a prima facie case. In his defense, he further contended that the Commonwealth did not establish that the house was a dwelling house as required in Code § 18.2–89. Giles stated that the house was not a dwelling house since no one was living there during the break-in and it was not used for sleeping on a regular basis.

Stuck Writing Your "Case Brief of Giles V Commonwealth" Case Study?

View All Our Example Case Brief of Giles V Commonwealth Case Study

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Giles’ motion to strike was denied by the Circuit Court, which found adequate evidence that it was a dwelling…

[…… parts of this paper are missing, click here to view the entire document ]

…S.E.2d 879 (Va. 2009)] [2: Ibid., 1.]Policy (if there is any)None.ReasoningBased on the burglary statute, a house used for habitation is a dwelling house. Moreover, a house does not lose its dwelling status simply because an individual is absent for either a regular or irregular time period. Periodic habitation of a house does not necessitate that the residence is used at regular periods of time as long as it’s used for habitation purposes.HoldingThe Court denied Giles’ appeal and upheld the ruling of the Court of Appeals. The court argued that the appellate court did not err in upholding the ruling of the circuit court since Mr. Thornton’s house met the requirement of a dwelling house under….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Case Brief Of Giles V Commonwealth" (2022, August 07) Retrieved May 22, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/case-brief-giles-commonwealth-2179311

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Case Brief Of Giles V Commonwealth" 07 August 2022. Web.22 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/case-brief-giles-commonwealth-2179311>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Case Brief Of Giles V Commonwealth", 07 August 2022, Accessed.22 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/case-brief-giles-commonwealth-2179311
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example