Challenger Shuttle Disaster While People Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1002 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 3



In addition, the Rogers Commission made specific recommendations related to these issues. They suggested that NASA restructure its management system, including bringing astronauts into management positions, which will increase attention to flight safety issues. They suggested a full examination of all critical systems before conducting any more shuttle launches. They were instructed to establish an Office of Safety, Reliability and Quality control. These suggestions bring safety back to prominence in decision-making, and should downplay the effect of pressure to meet deadlines (Harwood, 1986).

The Rogers Commission also criticized NASA's communications and instructed them to devise ways that information flows from bottom to top as well as from top to bottom. In addition they expressed concern about a tendency for management to be somewhat isolated from others, further interfering with communication (Harwood, 1986). If middle management had been able to communicate effectively with upper levels in 1986, the GDSS would have heard about O. ring concerns from within NASA as well as from M-T.

The Rodgers Commission, in addition to making numerous suggestions about how to improve the structure of shuttles and ways to increase safety for the astronauts, noted the management decisions that contributed so significantly to the disaster.

Stuck Writing Your "Challenger Shuttle Disaster While People" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Challenger Shuttle Disaster While People Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

They particularly noted that decision makers were under considerable pressure to maintain ambitious flight schedules (Harwood, 1986). This pressure stemmed from both political and economic forces. NASA will have to decide whether its goals are one of scientific inquiry or of making money through space exploration. When it is recognized that these two goals are incompatible, they will have to be prioritized. Given the inherently danger to space exploration, it will be clear that safety, based on the best science available, will have to be the overriding concern. In decision meetings, the structural dynamic must support real inquiry, not simply support a predetermined and preferred outcome.

In order to keep the shuttle program an effective vehicle for space exploration, safety of the astronauts must always be the first concern. Deadlines must always be flexible and based on the ability of NASA to make a launch that is as safe as possible. Final votes on decisions must be made anonymously to eliminate the influence of group pressure for a goal inappropriate for such a risky endeavor......

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Challenger Shuttle Disaster While People" (2004, November 06) Retrieved May 20, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/challenger-shuttle-disaster-while-people-57479

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Challenger Shuttle Disaster While People" 06 November 2004. Web.20 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/challenger-shuttle-disaster-while-people-57479>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Challenger Shuttle Disaster While People", 06 November 2004, Accessed.20 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/challenger-shuttle-disaster-while-people-57479
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example