Checklists Vs. Rating Scales Research Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 652 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 2

Observations vs. interviews

Observations, as the name suggests, involve the observation of the study subjects, in a natural or an experimental environment. The researcher takes notes upon what he or she sees, either in a prominently-displayed position or in a less obtrusive position. Interviews may be unstructured, semi-structured, or highly-structured, but all types involve directly soliciting information from subjects (Aiken & Groth-Marnat & 2006).

There are potential benefits and drawbacks to both observations and interviews. In terms of validity, observer bias and lack of awareness can corrupt observational data. However, interviews can likewise be problematic given that the questions can intentionally or unintentionally be used to shape the respondents' replies in a particular and inaccurate fashion. Observations can be very difficult to reproduce, given they take place at specific moments in time and both methods make use of relatively small test populations, versus quantitative studies. This narrows the demographic reach of these largely qualitative methods.

The advantage of observation is that it allows for subjects to speak for themselves and minimizes researcher interference.

Stuck Writing Your "Checklists Vs. Rating Scales" Research Paper?

View All Our Example Checklists Vs. Rating Scales Research Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

For a population about which the researcher knows very little, such as in the case of an anthropological study of a foreign culture, observations may be more appropriate. Also, some subjects because of cultural or linguistic barriers might not be suitable to interview. However, interviews can still yield important insights about phenomena, particularly thoughts and feelings that cannot be readily observed. Interview responses to questions can also be more easily coded and compared with previous research than observations. Ethical issues may arise with both that must be addressed, however, such as the consent of the observed to allow themselves to be subjected to a research study (which is more easily obtained in an interview format from either the subjects or, less ideally and more problematically, the parents or caregivers of the subjects if minors or individuals unable to consent are involved).

Checklists vs. rating scales

"Checklists usually offer a yes/no format in relation….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Checklists Vs Rating Scales" (2014, October 19) Retrieved June 4, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/checklists-rating-scales-192873

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Checklists Vs Rating Scales" 19 October 2014. Web.4 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/checklists-rating-scales-192873>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Checklists Vs Rating Scales", 19 October 2014, Accessed.4 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/checklists-rating-scales-192873
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example