Is No Child Left Behind a Flawed Policy Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 698 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 2

No Child Left Behind is an inherently flawed policy because it unites what are essentially two diametrically opposed educational philosophies. These philosophies are based on the ideas of Adler on the one hand and Holt on the other (Koonce, 2016). The philosophy of Adler is that public schools should promote a democratic approach to education in the sense that all students adhere to and follow a uniform curriculum and standards. This standard curriculum is evident in No Child Left Behind. However, Holt’s philosophy is also evident in that the policy also views every child as a unique individual with his or her own special needs, which means that every student who is struggling should receive special attention to help him or her reach objectives. These two philosophical approaches are more opposed than they are aligned, and to combine the two is to present a drain on resources that most schools simply cannot afford to have happen in their districts.

The idea of producing nationwide standards for all students in public schools is unrealistic, as educational approaches and standards will vary from region to region, district to district and school to school. Instead of obliging all schools to operate under the same set of standards, there should be competition among the schools, with each school offering what it believes to be the best approach to education: students and faculty would then decide for themselves if that was a place they would like to attend or if there was another school that they would rather go to.

As Knight (2008) notes, central powers in the government should simply assist schools and “guide them in the development of an internally consistent point of view and a program that [is] related realistically to the larger world context” (p. 5).

Stuck Writing Your "Is No Child Left Behind a Flawed Policy" Essay?

View All Our Example Is No Child Left Behind a Flawed Policy Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Instead of trying to control schools from the top down and thus limiting many teachers and students in terms of what they can do and how they can do it, the central government should rather promote, encourage and support schools in identifying what it is they can do best given their resources and helping them to achieve the goals that are unique to their circumstances. No Child Left Behind does not do this: instead, it obliges schools to approach education in a way that rewards testing rather than knowledge acquisition (U.S. Departmetn of Education, 2015): the more students who can “pass” a test,….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Is No Child Left Behind A Flawed Policy" (2018, May 09) Retrieved July 4, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/child-left-behind-flawed-policy-2169584

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Is No Child Left Behind A Flawed Policy" 09 May 2018. Web.4 July. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/child-left-behind-flawed-policy-2169584>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Is No Child Left Behind A Flawed Policy", 09 May 2018, Accessed.4 July. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/child-left-behind-flawed-policy-2169584
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example