Christian Louboutin Vs. Yves Saint Laurent Identify Case Study

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 699 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 2

Christian Louboutin vs. Yves Saint Laurent

Identify Yves Saint Laurent's defense to their use of red soles in their collections (in other words, what do they claim makes their look or placement of color different from Louboutin's signature look?).

A New York federal court of appeals granted Christian Louboutin "trademark protection over its signature red sole" when Yves Saint Laurent produced a fashion line with a similarly-colored red shoe ("Christian Louboutin vs. YSL 'Red Soles' Court Case Takes A New Twist," The Huffington Post, 2012). The decision was then appealed and the appellate judge ruled "that Louboutin is entitled to its trademark on red soles, except when the entire shoe is red. Except that the YSL shoes were entirely red," thus giving YSL the ability to make red-soled shoes under very specific conditions ("Christian Louboutin vs. YSL 'Red Soles' Court Case Takes A New Twist," The Huffington Post, 2012). YSL alleged that there was no way that his all-red shoes could be mistaken by his competitor's, which all have red soles.

Q2. Identify Christian Louboutin's justification to obtaining rights to his signature look.

Christian Louboutin's red-soled shoes are part of his 'signature' style.

Stuck Writing Your "Christian Louboutin Vs. Yves Saint Laurent Identify" Case Study?

View All Our Example Christian Louboutin Vs. Yves Saint Laurent Identify Case Study

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Louboutin asked for a patent for the red-soled shoes, which was granted in 2008. The patent gave him exclusive rights to manufacture such shoes and given that YSL's shoes had red soles, he considered this an infringement ("Christian Louboutin vs. YSL 'Red Soles' Court Case Takes A New Twist," The Huffington Post, 2012).

Q3. Do you agree that the most recent court ruling was a fair outcome for both parties? If not, why?

Yes. It would clearly stifle the creative potential of other fashion manufacturers if they were unable to create red shoes of any kind, simply because Louboutin had been granted a patent for his red-soled shoes. Moreover, the original patent should have been far more specific in nature, to ensure that such confusion and potential stifling of creative intelligence did not occur. Giving a broad patent for red-soled shoes means that other manufacturers could potentially be prosecuted because they wished to create shoes of….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Christian Louboutin Vs Yves Saint Laurent Identify" (2013, March 22) Retrieved May 22, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/christian-louboutin-yves-saint-laurent-identify-102482

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Christian Louboutin Vs Yves Saint Laurent Identify" 22 March 2013. Web.22 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/christian-louboutin-yves-saint-laurent-identify-102482>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Christian Louboutin Vs Yves Saint Laurent Identify", 22 March 2013, Accessed.22 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/christian-louboutin-yves-saint-laurent-identify-102482
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example