Commercial Use of Ground Water Term Paper

Total Length: 836 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 3

Commercial Use of Michigan Groundwater

Appropriately named the "Great Lakes State," Michigan is the only state whose borders lie completely within the world's largest system of fresh surface water, the Great Lakes basin, which constitutes 18% of the world's water supply.(4)

Traditionally, Michigan has relied primarily on "riparian" rights analyses derived from English common law to regulate the commercial use of its largest natural resource. Since riparian concepts focus primarily on the relative rights of competing users of surface waters, there has, until very recently, been comparatively little regulation of the underground springs or aquifer system which feeds the surface water system, or of the rights of the state to control removal of water resources for use or sale elsewhere.

On November 25, 2003, Mecosta County Circuit Court Judge Lawrence Root issued a lengthy opinion that finally addressed the problem and defined many of the issues under the laws of Michigan. The dispute arose in 2001, after Nestle, the world's largest food company, obtained drilling rights from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) on behalf of Perrier Group of America, one of its subsidiary companies, to remove 210 million gallons of fresh groundwater per year from Sanctuary Springs in Central Michigan, for bottling and sale throughout Nestle's global commercial market.
(1)

Legal Issues:

The range of concern over and regulation of the natural resource of water spans a wide spectrum among the states bordering on the Great Lakes. While Minnesota requires a permit to draw more than 10,000 gallons per day from Lake

Superior, and includes "groundwater" in its definitions, Indiana allows unlimited use or withdrawal) of water from Lake Michigan. (1)

Michigan law strictly regulates pollution issues and environmental effects caused by commercial water use, but addressed removal of water resources only indirectly. Furthermore, because the intimate workings of the underground aquifers and their relationship to surface waters was not understood at the time Michigan water use laws were drafted, they fail to address groundwater removal, the subject of the dispute between Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation and Nestle/Perrier Group.

In granting the drilling rights, Michigan officials relied exclusively on issues of "reasonable use" as that concept had been traditionally applied in state courts and at English common law in deciding the relative rights of land owners (or users) in pari materia, or occupying similar relationships to the resource in question. In the absence of case law precedent on the specific issue of removal of groundwater resources, Judge Root relied on dicta in four earlier.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Commercial Use Of Ground Water" (2004, February 08) Retrieved May 20, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/commercial-use-ground-water-161175

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Commercial Use Of Ground Water" 08 February 2004. Web.20 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/commercial-use-ground-water-161175>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Commercial Use Of Ground Water", 08 February 2004, Accessed.20 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/commercial-use-ground-water-161175