Computer Hackers and Search and Seizure United States Vs. Jarrett Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 737 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 2

Computer Hackers Case Study

Hackers are people portrayed as super-criminals who have powers that enable them roam the internet searching for valuable information that is contained in an individual's or company's computer. The article is about a case of the United States v. Jarrett.in Jarrett the issue was if the prosecution was in apposition to use information that had been obtained by the search of private hackers of the defendant's personal computer. A computer hacker known as unknown user had hacked into steigner's computer and stumbled into evidence of child pornography. He went ahead to send emails containing the images and Steiger's personal information to the Alabama police department. Steiner was later arrested and he was convicted and sentenced to 171/2 years in prison. Unknown user was not to be prosecuted for hacking since he was a foreigner and thus was not subject to the laws in the U.S. He later gave out information about another suspect of child pornography Jarrett and was still assured that he would not be a target of law enforcement for his activities of hacking. He spoke freely of how he was engaged in hacking activities and vowed to continue the search of child pornographers using the same methods that he had employed for the arrest of Steiger and Jarrett.

Stuck Writing Your "Computer Hackers and Search and Seizure United States Vs. Jarrett" Essay?

View All Our Example Computer Hackers and Search and Seizure United States Vs. Jarrett Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written



However Jarret made a move to suppress the evidence by execution of the search warrant based on the government had violated his fourth amendment right by using information that unknown user had produced to secure the search warrant. When the court was analyzing the issue of suppression it looked at whether there was an agency of relationship that existed between the hacker and government and went ahead to apply a traditional two part agency relationship test to a problem that was ultra-modern in order for them to achieve a result that was flawed. Instead of requiring the government actively acquiesce in the search for the establishment of the agency of the relationship, the court ought to have looked to see whether there was passive acquiescence. This is what such a strict standard is required so as to protect an individual's fourth amendment rights against seizures and unreasonable searches in situations that deal with….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Computer Hackers And Search And Seizure United States Vs Jarrett" (2013, August 11) Retrieved May 16, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/computer-hackers-search-seizure-united-states-94405

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Computer Hackers And Search And Seizure United States Vs Jarrett" 11 August 2013. Web.16 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/computer-hackers-search-seizure-united-states-94405>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Computer Hackers And Search And Seizure United States Vs Jarrett", 11 August 2013, Accessed.16 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/computer-hackers-search-seizure-united-states-94405
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example