Controversial Art and Politics Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 906 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1

Page 1 of 3

Artistic Expression

A comedian named Tommy Smothers, member of the Smother's Brothers comedy team and target of a battle over censorship, once said "The only valid censorship of ideas is the right of people not to listen." (Smothers) This notion also applies to watching, and viewing artistic expression as well. While some in the United States have tried to impose their view of morality upon the nation through the censoring of what they consider "objectionable," others have fought back to maintain the right of free expression. In 1989, there was a case where a sitting Senator objected to the subject of a work of art that was awarded a government grant. This Senator wrote to the president complaining about the National Endowment for the Arts and it's support of this particular artist. In response the artist defiantly defended his right of artistic expression and warned of the dangers of censorship. If America is going to be a free nation, with freedom of speech and expression at the core of it's values, then American adults cannot be limited to the kinds of artistic expression that only some find acceptable. Americans must have the freedom of expression, even if they express very unpopular opinions; and if someone doesn't like it, they do not have to view it.

In 1989, Senator Jesse Helms objected to an artwork which depicted a crucifix in a bottle of urine.

Stuck Writing Your "Controversial Art and Politics" Essay?

View All Our Example Controversial Art and Politics Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

While the senator has every right to object to what he described as "Blasphemy" (Helms, 1989) he did not have the right to deny every other American their right to decide if it was blasphemous or not. Instead, the Senator suggested that the National Endowment for the Arts "ought to be abolished and all funds returned to the taxpayer" (Helms, 1989) And while the Senator acknowledged this artist's constitutional right to freedom of expression, he didn't think the American taxpayers should finance it.

In response the artist, Andres Serrano, wrote a letter to the National Endowment for the Arts explaining the concept of his art and rationalizing his grant. He also stated "In a free society ideas, even difficult ones, are not dangerous. The only danger lies in repressing them." (Serrano, 1989) Serrano was correct, he had every right to artistically express himself any way he wanted.

What Senator Helms calls "Blasphemy and insensitivity to the religious community" (Helms, 1989), Andres Serrano calls his "exploration and juxtaposition of these symbols from which Christianity draws its strength." (Serrano, 1989) If the national government is going to be in the business of promoting the arts, it must promote a wide variety of artistic expression, without judgment or censorship. The government cannot be the arbitor of what is appropriate artistic expression; if so,….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Controversial Art And Politics" (2011, May 23) Retrieved May 22, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/controversial-art-politics-118796

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Controversial Art And Politics" 23 May 2011. Web.22 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/controversial-art-politics-118796>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Controversial Art And Politics", 23 May 2011, Accessed.22 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/controversial-art-politics-118796
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example