Corporate Governance Shell What Occurred Case Study

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 2084 words ( 7 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 6

Page 1 of 7



4. If Enron shareholders had been fully aware of the LJM partnership agreement, do you believe they would have been willing to continue investing in Enron?

LJM was created by Fastow allegedly to buy poorly performing Enron assets, but in reality to hide debt and inflate profits of Enron in order to leverage its stock price. It is almost certain that Enron shareholders would have ceased to continue investing in Enron had they been aware of the full significance of LJM.

LJM, in its essence, entailed that Enron was far below that which it's displayed to the public and that likely its debts were more massive and its profits far less than those claimed. Investors, obviously, would not want to invest in a poorly performing company.

Even if Enron's profits were higher and debts lower than those that the company tried to conceal, the very fact that Enron was not transparent or straight in its dealings would have caused it to lose the trust and confidence of its shareholders deterring shareholders from affiliating themselves with Enron had they been aware of the existence of LJM.

5. Discuss weather potential whistleblowers should be encouraged to report their concerns of poor corporate governance. Should they report their concerns within or outside the organization

Whistleblowers should be encouraged to expose their concern of poor cooperate government, but, to prevent ramifications form occurring to them and to encourage their openness, they should be stimulated to do so under the cover of confidentiality.

Stuck Writing Your "Corporate Governance Shell What Occurred" Case Study?

View All Our Example Corporate Governance Shell What Occurred Case Study

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Shell, for instance, implemented a site where it encourages whistleblowers to expose their concerns. In this situation, however, even thoguh confidentiality can be assumed, whistleblowers can still be tracked and they can reveal their identity would they wish to do so. This may intimidate potential whistleblowers from stepping forward. It is best, therefore, that Shell insist upon the condition of anonymity for all respondents and that the site for whistleblowers be detached from its website (perhaps with link leading to a relevant website belonging to a relevant organization). .

Both internal and external complaints of the organization should be addressed.

Whistleblowers are often deterred from coming forward, particularly since they face enormous risk that includes being ostracized by friends and employers, as well as threats, physical harm, workplace reprisal or dismissal. More so, very often, their reports are not only incompletely followed through, but they are distrusted and their warnings neglected. For all these reasons, the world needs more organizations such as Transparency International, the global network that attempts to fight international corruption, established in 10 countries that are committed to protecting whistleblowers. (Transparency International).....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Corporate Governance Shell What Occurred" (2012, January 09) Retrieved May 5, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/corporate-governance-shell-occurred-48779

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Corporate Governance Shell What Occurred" 09 January 2012. Web.5 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/corporate-governance-shell-occurred-48779>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Corporate Governance Shell What Occurred", 09 January 2012, Accessed.5 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/corporate-governance-shell-occurred-48779
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example