Counterterrorism Qualitative Approaches to Inquiry Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 803 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 3



Narrative research is considered rigorous because the focus is on the individual, particularly, the "story" or his/her experience of a specific phenomenon that the researcher is studying. Information generated is based on personal history and experience, and can therefore be as detailed as the researcher would want to (i.e., assuming appropriate methodologies and strategies are used to extract the information from the informant/interviewee). Case study, meanwhile, also displays the specificity that is evident in narrative research. While narrative research is purely exploratory and descriptive, case study can be useful in counterterrorism study in that it can provide also an analysis of a specific case, which could be an individual, group or entity described and later on analyzed for the reader's understanding of the specific phenomenon. In both cases, the reader of counterterrorism benefits from the details and wealth of information that both approaches provide.

On the opposite end of the spectrum are the grounded theory and ethnographic approaches. In grounded theory, the researcher attempts to create a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon under study through information that can eventually be developed into a theory, taken from the experiences of a significant number of individuals.

Stuck Writing Your "Counterterrorism Qualitative Approaches to Inquiry" Essay?

View All Our Example Counterterrorism Qualitative Approaches to Inquiry Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Ethnography uses the same approach, only, it differs from grounded theory in that ethnography attempts to provide a comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon as it occurs in a homogenous group -- that is, a group wherein individuals share the same characteristics, lifestyle, values and beliefs. If the reader of counterterrorism would want to have a comprehensive understanding of an event, phenomenon or group, then these approaches are better suited.

Phenomenology, since it is neither comprehensive and exhaustive nor specific and detailed in terms of the quality of information generated, it is then considered the least relevant approach for the reader of counterterrorism. This approach cannot provide the detailed information that one would probably need to understand a group or event at a 'microscopic level.' Similarly, if the reader of counterterrorism would like an overall or comprehensive picture of an event, phenomenon, or group, phenomenology would be insufficient since it only provides information culled out from a certain number of people -- it is not as exhaustive as grounded theory or ethnography......

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Counterterrorism Qualitative Approaches To Inquiry" (2012, June 08) Retrieved May 18, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/counterterrorism-qualitative-approaches-58853

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Counterterrorism Qualitative Approaches To Inquiry" 08 June 2012. Web.18 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/counterterrorism-qualitative-approaches-58853>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Counterterrorism Qualitative Approaches To Inquiry", 08 June 2012, Accessed.18 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/counterterrorism-qualitative-approaches-58853
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example