Courts Lag the Evidence in Eyewitness Identification Essay

Total Length: 682 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 2



Of the five criteria set by the courts for the reliability test, which one do you believe to be the weakest? Why?

The reliability criteria that have been developed as the science of eyewitness information advanced include the following: View, attention, certainty, descriptions, and time between crime and confrontation (Wells & Quinlivan, 2009). Of the five reliability criteria, three -- view, attention, and certainty -- are attributes of retrospective self-reports. Certainty is the criteria that I believe is the weakest since the literature is replete with studied that show how fallible the certainty of an eyewitness's testimony can be. Strong empirical evidence exists to show that retrospective self-reports frequently do not match the presentation of objective facts (Wells & Quinlivan, 2009).

Stuck Writing Your "Courts Lag the Evidence in Eyewitness Identification" Essay?

Retrospective self-reports have been shown to be quite malleable and people are not skilled at identifying which factors influence their self-reports (Nisbett and Wilson, 1977). Several of the reliability criteria are not independent of one another nor are they linear in nature concern (Wells & Quinlivan, Moreover, the suggestiveness augmentation effect presents a serious and substantive threat to the reliability of the two-prong totality approach that guides Manson concern (Wells & Quinlivan, Notably, a disincentive is created for prosecutors or police to avoid suggestive procedures, and there is relation between the suggestive procedures, the skew of the resulting retrospective self-reports, and the placement of the witness on the criteria -- all of which results in dismissal of the suggestiveness concern (Wells.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Courts Lag The Evidence In Eyewitness Identification" (2014, March 31) Retrieved April 28, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/courts-lag-evidence-eyewitness-identification-186429

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Courts Lag The Evidence In Eyewitness Identification" 31 March 2014. Web.28 April. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/courts-lag-evidence-eyewitness-identification-186429>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Courts Lag The Evidence In Eyewitness Identification", 31 March 2014, Accessed.28 April. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/courts-lag-evidence-eyewitness-identification-186429