Criminal Justice Contributions Three Theorists Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 871 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 3

According to Beccaria, any form or degree of punishment that exceeded the comparative seriousness of the crime or the functional purpose of effectively deterring that crime was excessive, purposeless, and cruel. Based on that philosophy, Beccaria proposed that penal consequences should be designed to be sufficiently harsh to cause individuals contemplating criminal behavior to re-evaluate that choice on a rational basis and to avoid (rational) choices to perpetrate crime as a direct result of their awareness of the risks of specific kinds of punishment that corresponded to those crimes (Lynch, 1999).

The Contributions of Lombroso to Criminal Justice

Unlike Durkheim and Beccaria, Lombroso rejected the societal and functional dynamics of criminality as primary contributors to deviance and crime in society. Lombroso specifically argued that crime was substantially the result of innate difference in individuals that predisposed certain people to deviance and criminality beyond their conscious control, and certainly, beyond the dynamics of any rational-choice-based motivation (Lynch, 1999). This theory of criminal atavism (i.e. "from the father") suggested that criminality was largely a function of inheritable characteristics that ran in families and were transmitted from generation to generation in the same manner as physical characteristics such as height, eye color, and hair color.

Stuck Writing Your "Criminal Justice Contributions Three Theorists" Essay?

View All Our Example Criminal Justice Contributions Three Theorists Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written



In his time, Lombroso's theories could not necessarily contribute productively to criminal justice, simply because they were inconsistent with a deterrent or punitive approach to reducing criminal inclinations in individuals. However, his general assumptions about the organic nature of personality, temperament, and behavioral inclinations have enjoyed a resurgence in the modern age of biological sciences, psychobiology, and modern genetics (Nagin, 1998). Today, contemporary criminologists and psychologists routinely incorporate biologically-based concepts and factors to help understand the extent to which human behavior generally and deviance and criminality more particularly are sometimes heavily influenced by organic processes (Nagin, 1998). As Lombroso originally suspected and argued, certain elements of personality and temperament are indeed dictated or at least heavily influenced by idiosyncratic differences among individuals, many of which are functions of heritability. What Lombroso probably never imagined is the manner in which his theory would also apply to the developmental cognitive and psychobiological processes......

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Criminal Justice Contributions Three Theorists" (2011, December 17) Retrieved May 18, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/criminal-justice-contributions-three-theorists-48585

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Criminal Justice Contributions Three Theorists" 17 December 2011. Web.18 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/criminal-justice-contributions-three-theorists-48585>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Criminal Justice Contributions Three Theorists", 17 December 2011, Accessed.18 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/criminal-justice-contributions-three-theorists-48585
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example