Criminal Justice: Perjury in Policing Term Paper

Total Length: 1551 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 5

Page 1 of 5

Michigan, in which police officers had failed to satisfy the knock requirement of a "knock and announce" search warrant before obtaining incriminating evidence. The Court decided that technical violations of proper warrant execution in "good faith" of the nature described in Hudson would not trigger the exclusionary rule (Schott, 2006)..

Ultimately, as constitutional criminal procedure developed since Mapp, a balance arose between the need to safeguard the constitutional rights of the accused with the need to preserve the admissibility of evidence when violations associated with its procurement do not rise to the level necessitating its exclusion.

Stuck Writing Your "Criminal Justice: Perjury in Policing" Term Paper?

More than any other factor, this balance also allowed police the appropriate freedom to perform their assigned function of preventing crime, apprehending criminal suspects, and collecting evidence without having to compromise their ethics and violate their sworn oaths to do so effectively......

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Criminal Justice Perjury In Policing" (2007, September 16) Retrieved May 16, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/criminal-justice-perjury-policing-35754

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Criminal Justice Perjury In Policing" 16 September 2007. Web.16 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/criminal-justice-perjury-policing-35754>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Criminal Justice Perjury In Policing", 16 September 2007, Accessed.16 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/criminal-justice-perjury-policing-35754