Death Penalty Research Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 2937 words ( 10 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 8

Page 1 of 10

Death Penalty

From the beginning of a capital punishment trial, the focus of the legal process is on the perpetrator's rights. If found guilty of the crime for which he or she stands accused, and once the death penalty sentence is imposed, the subsequent legal processes and efforts continue to be focused on the perpetrator's legal rights, but gain the added dimension of his or her human rights. The victim and the victim's surviving family members' rights exist only during the investigation of the crime, when the focus is to bring the perpetrator to justice. Justice, however, is structured to protect the perpetrator's rights; the victim's rights cease once the case goes to trial. Each death sentence becomes a new argument against capital punishment by opponents of the death penalty whose advocacy is relentless. Abolitionists argue for life imprisonment, but the prison system in the United States is a system for rehabilitation and reform (Lynch, 2007, p. 14), not punishment. The argument for life imprisonment lacks the logical consideration that pure evil cannot be rehabilitated.

Proponents of the death penalty understand that rehabilitation does not work for certain perpetrators and certain acts of criminal violence. For instance, there is no rehabilitative cure for pedophiles who murder children, because before they are murderers they are pedophiles, and there is no cure for pedophilia; and there is no rehabilitative cure for serial murderers. Often the violence of these types of criminals is consistent with psychiatric diagnoses like schizophrenia, paranoia, and brain damage (Vronsky, 2004, pp. 149, 274, 278).

Opponents of the death penalty hold that putting a person to death for a horrific crime is revenge, and not justice. They argue that innocent people have been put to death as a result of unfair trials or tainted legal evidence. Yet they do not stop to consider the innocent people who will die if the death penalty is abolished (Bedau, 2008, p. 188). The concept of rehabilitation is to treat and, then, to reinsert the rehabilitated individual back into society (Mellenhoff, 2009). We cannot achieve rehabilitation without release. The idea of reinserting back into society vicious criminals on the premise that they have been rehabilitated is absurd, but it has happened time and again (Vronsky, 2004, p. 263).

The research presented here focuses on life sentences over the death penalty, and it examines the role of rehabilitation in the life of prisoners who have committed violent crimes of murder. The question that is asked here is: Do we have the right to release convicted murderers back into society when there is no certainty that they will not kill again?

History of the Death Penalty

The death penalty came to America with colonization (Bedau and Cassell, 2005, p. 16). It was what the colonizers had known as part of the legal systems from their countries of origins. Just as long, arguments against the death penalty have been made along the lines of reason (Bedau and Cassell, 2005, p. 16).

"Benjamin Rush of Philadelphia -- physician, friend of Benjamin Franklin, and one of the Founding Fathers -- was second to none as an outspoken opponent of the hangman. In 1797 he published a lecture attacking public executions under the title "Considerations of the Injustice and Impolicy of Punishing Murder by Death (Bedau and Cassell, 2005, p. 16)."

As long as the United States has existed as a Republic, there has been the death penalty, and advocates to eliminate it. Early in our history when Benjamin Rush wrote his "Considerations," the death penalty was for crimes that endangered peoples' lives, as well as murder. A horse could mean the difference between life and death to a struggling farmer, as did chickens and other live stock. There was no form of public assistance or unemployment and people found ways to survive, mostly on charity of community with one another. They could not tolerate thievery and murder, and the death penalty was probably more of a deterrent than it is today. The methods of execution were archaic and executions were held in public to serve as a warning and as a lesson learned to others. Psychiatry was a little understood or practiced art, and the concept of rehabilitation and reform did not exist. Prison was about punishment, and the punishment imposed was harsh, as were the prison conditions in which people were held to serve out their punishment. Murderers were executed.

Today, of course, executions are held out of public sight, but there is much more publicity about the event of capital punishment being carried out than there is about the crime that caused the perpetrator to be on death row. Usually, the news of horrific murders committed by asocial individuals makes community headlines and perhaps a paragraph nationally.

Stuck Writing Your "Death Penalty" Research Paper?

View All Our Example Death Penalty Research Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

In either case, the details of the crime are often so offensive to a person's senses that they are left out, or at the time of the reporting there is an ongoing investigation and authorities cannot release the evidence or details of the case.

The investigation and prosecution of violent crimes have become time consuming processes of the legal system, and the details of the prosecution of each individual murder that is committed usually goes unreported unless it is a sensational case or the victim was a person well-known to the public, such as a celebrity. But the execution of the perpetrator, who has spent as long as a year in jail after his arraignment or after a grand jury reviews the evidence and indicts him or her, is often nationally followed to call attention to the issue of the death penalty and to renew the debate of what many people still believe to be the wrong response to murder. The victim, the family of the victim, the police detectives and officers, and lawyers and judges who have to work the case and who suffer the psychological impact of having to review crime scene photographs, review evidence, and follow a case through prosecution are rationalized away by anti-death penalty advocates.

Lawyer turned author, Scott Turow (2004) recalls one such case of a double murder in Illinois, and remembers how his friend and colleague who followed the case and ultimately prosecuted experienced grief and sadness of the senseless tragedy of random murder. When Turow's colleagues successfully prosecuted the case to a death penalty sentence, and Turow says, ". . . In 1984, I relished their victory (p. 5)." Turow relished the victory because he watched a close friend go through the emotional investment of bringing to justice a man who had committed a pure act of evil, and a man who had crossed a forbidden line in society from which there was no turning back, and if released back into society, he would surely kill again.

In the case Turow recalled the evidence against the murderer was flawless, and involved no reasonable doubt. It is reasonable doubt and the lack of evidence that anti-death penalty advocates often point to as a reason not to carry out a death penalty. Indeed, one of the most talented and experienced lawyers in America, and a well-known figure since he teamed with O.J. Simpson's "Dream Team," Barry Scheck, is amongst the most outspoken anti-death penalty advocates in America. Scheck has overturned death penalty sentences by taking convicted perpetrator's cases on appeal, and proving that the evidence with which the perpetrator was convicted on was lacking, tainted, and in some cases manufactured.

"Scheck calls for a critical look into the death penalty in America, quoting George Will that "capital punishment, like the rest of the criminal justice system, is a government program, so skepticism is in order (deathpenalty.org, 2010, online)."

Scheck's work has indeed called into question death penalty sentences that were based on poor DNA and other questionable evidence. No one wants to believe that a person who was truly innocent of a horrific crime and who was put to death for that crime was actually innocent, but it has happened, as Scheck has proven time and again. And Americans need to have confidence in our legal system, and, above all, that the people prosecuting individuals to capital punishment penalties are honest and diligent in collecting evidence and in examining evidence. There should be severe penalties for manufactured evidence that leads to capital punishment. However, today, DNA testing, properly done, is irrefutable, and the instances that Scheck will have as technology improves of overturning a death penalty on the basis of invalid or manufactured evidence will certainly become fewer and fewer. There must be oversight and people, like Scheck, who are dedicated to oversight, are performing a valuable civil service to the rest of society. But if the system is flawed, it is a two-way flaw, because frequently we hear of people who have long criminal histories as rapists and even murders being released back into society as having been reformed or rehabilitated, and they kill again or repeat their violence as rapists, and their level of violence often escalates, and manifests….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Death Penalty As a Deterrent for Murder

Abstract This paper examines the death penalty as a deterrent and argues that states have not only the right but the duty to apply the death penalty to criminal cases because it is incumbent upon states to back the law with force. The death penalty acts as a forceful and compelling consequence for those who should choose to violate the law and commit murder. For that reason it can be said to be a deterrent. This paper also examines the opposing arguments and shows that those would say it is not an effective deterrent cannot… Continue Reading...

Death Penalty Based on Film Dead Man Walking

The film Dead Man Walking presents a complex view of the death penalty, as the filmmakers avoid oversimplifying the issue or pontificating a particular point of view. Sister Helen (Susan Sarandon) is called upon to work with a man on death row: Matthew Poncelet (Sean Penn). Poncelet is presented as a thoroughly distasteful human being, one that the audience can scarce sympathize with at first. Yet as his immanent death approaches, Poncelet does change, however meaningless and futile that small change may be. His initial deceit fades into a frank recognition of his crime, and the audience is left to wonder… Continue Reading...

Death Penalty Essay

punishment on a state-by-state basis. Not all states have the death penalty but executions are still carried out in the United States and the punishment remains controversial. Despite the singularity of its status internationally, the death penalty has historically been a popular policy in the United States, even though it has been hotly debated throughout US history in the legislature and the courts. This essay on death penalty will examine its legal statusin the United States, its history, and its future. [toc] Topics The Future of the Death Penalty in America Why America Has a Death Penalty Death Penalty: Arguments… Continue Reading...

Dead Man Walking and Capital Punishment

evil deeds. I have more complex views on the death penalty. For the most part, I disagree with it, as I object to the notion that human beings should be able to play God with others. All humans have the right to life, and there’s nothing in philosophy that necessarily dictates that humans have the right to seize that right from other humans. Furthermore, many of the ways that humans are put to death via capital punishment can actually be quite painful. There also hasn’t been adequate research that killing people actually deters others from engaging in criminal activity.… Continue Reading...

Sociology and the Death Penalty

The death penalty should exist as a deterrent but only in a society where the criminal justice system is aligned with social justice—i.e., in a state where there is no deviation from the way the community views justice and from the way the criminal justice system views justice. Criminal justice and social justice must be in accordance, as Bazelon asserts, in order for a system of law to work, to be fair, to be equitable, and to be effective. In a society where social justice is at odds with criminal justice,… Continue Reading...

Argument in Favor of the Life in Prison over Execution

The death penalty is a vestige of the past, a time when vengeance and retribution were the standard means of dealing with transgressions or deviance. While there are significant drawbacks with the American penal system and corrections institutions, a life term in prison is a far more reasonable sentence for the most heinous of crimes than capital punishment is. There are several reasons why the death penalty plays no role at all in a civilized democracy, and why it also threatens to undermine the very foundations of Constitutional law. The worst… Continue Reading...

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

state that promotes democracy and equality over the abuses of Arab rule. Imagine a homosexual person supporting Palestine – where their very existence would subject them to the death penalty – over Israel. Israel's culture of democracy, education and openness is much more aligned with traditional American values than Arab culture. Interesting that a "tilt" is pre-assumed. I assume this attempt to lead the students is not at all rooted in bias. But in all honesty, America's role in the Israel/Palestine conflict reflects its power in the region, not a desire or goal to be some magically neutral third party. There is no neutral negotiator in this conflict; all parties have agendas and they negotiate on the basis… Continue Reading...

Incompatibility Between Islam and Human Rights

While the Islamic principle holds that there should be no compulsion in religious, nevertheless, the traditional Islamic law implements harsh punishment for apostasy between a life imprisonment for women and death penalty for men. In essence, the Sharia law views the action of apostasy as forbidden known as Haram. While the human right law affirms freedom of religion, however, the Sharia law forbids freedom of religion, and a change from Islam to other religions is highly restricted. Some Islamic states inflict a penalty of capital punishment for converting to other religions. Rehman, (2014) uses the rejectionist theoretical approach to argue about the incompatibility of Islam with human rights. The author points out that "Sharia can never be compatible with the… Continue Reading...

Perspectives from the Liberals and Conservatives About Government Functions

The first policy we will talk about is death penalty. According to liberals, death penalty is ‘cruel and unusual’ and it should be abolished as every instance such an execution is made, there is a risk of killing an innocent person. However, conservatives believe that death penalty is the ideal punishment for any murderer who has taken away an innocent life. (Graham et.al 2009) The second policy is the Embryonic Stem Cell Research. According to the liberals, using embryonic stem cells for research is needful and ethical and the government should fund such scientists as it goes a… Continue Reading...

The Morality of Dropping Atomic Bomb on Japan

death penalty) with the act of killing civilians in war to make his point. In the case of the former, the death sentence is given as a form of punishment for a crime committed. The person executed is found guilty of an offense worthy of capital punishment. In the case of the latter, those exterminated on not judged to have been guilty of any offense. Their “crime” is merely that they live in a country that is at war with another country. Instead of the countries fighting it out on… Continue Reading...

Captain Preston Guilty or Innocent

civilians were all charged with firing at the window of the Customs House. All of them faced the death penalty for what they did. The rather brisk pace at which things progressed from the actual even to a trial is rather concerning. However, this does not mean that the wrong decision was made. Another concerning matter is that the group had a hard time finding counsel. However, they eventually succeeded in finding a lawyer in the form of John Adams. To state the obvious, this was a fairly interesting choice for Adams given that he was defending men who were accused of murdering five people. Once things did… Continue Reading...

Norway and Germany Compared to US in Incarceration

is run like a concentration camp. In Norway, the approach to law and order is much different: there is no death penalty in Norway, no life sentences, no armed police. An interview with Norway's State Philosopher is also very revealing: he shows that the country is forward-looking instead of consumed with the present, with the here-and-now, with the Me Generation. Norway wants to conserve its resources (it will spend its surplus but preserve its capital) so that future generations will benefit -- and this mentality is also realized in the country's approach to corrections. Those who break the law are viewed sympathetically rather than vilified or viewed as potential source… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Death Penalty" (2010, December 11) Retrieved May 4, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/death-penalty-122030

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Death Penalty" 11 December 2010. Web.4 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/death-penalty-122030>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Death Penalty", 11 December 2010, Accessed.4 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/death-penalty-122030
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example