Definition of Invasion of Privacy in Workplace Affair Article Review

Total Length: 889 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 3

Outrageous Conduct and Invasion of PrivacyIn the workplace, the term “outrageous conduct” typically refers to any behavior that is beyond the pale of what is considered acceptable. This can include everything from sexual harassment and discrimination to threats and physical violence. Invasion of privacy, on the other hand, generally refers to any unauthorized intrusion into another person's private life. This can include anything from eavesdropping and snooping to using hidden cameras or taking photos without consent. While both types of misconduct can have a serious impact on the victim, invasion of privacy is often considered to be more egregious since it infringing on an individual's right to privacy. With respect to the case, Judge Dailey notes in Pearson v. Kancilla (2003), “the elements of outrageous conduct are: (1) the defendant engaged in extreme and outrageous conduct, (2) recklessly or with the intent of causing the plaintiff severe emotional distress, and (3) causing the plaintiff severe emotional distress” (p. 1). Invasion of privacy, according to Dailey in the same case and in accordance with Colorado state law, is defined as “(1) unreasonable intrusion upon the seclusion of another ("seclusion"); (2) unreasonable publicity given to another's private life ("disclosure"); and (3) appropriation of another's name or likeness ("appropriation")” (p. 4).The charges of the case are that Kancilla (defendant) invaded the privacy of and engaged in outrageous conduct against plaintiffs Pearson and Fahy. Judgment favored the plaintiffs and Kancilla was ordered to make financial restitution. Kancilla sought an appeal, arguing that there was no evidence of outrageous conduct or invasion of privacy.

Stuck Writing Your "Definition of Invasion of Privacy in Workplace Affair" Article Review?

Judge Dailey denied the appeal arguing that evidence for both existed, and in the judgment this is stated clearly, point by point, with reference to other cases to support the judgment and reference to state law on…

[…… parts of this paper are missing, click here to view the entire document ]

…clearly and reasonably why Kancilla did do the things that he was accused of doing and therefore had no grounds for appeal based on what he argued in the appeal.Thus, Dailey confirmed that judgment be awarded to the plaintiffs, and that Kancilla should be required to be pay the fines. This was not the end of the case, however, as Kancilla would appeal again, and he would try to use bankruptcy law to protect his assets. The case would ultimately go to the Colorado State Supreme Court in 2008. Overall, this case shows that when a professional starts an affair with a patient or an employee it in and of itself can be considered outrageous conduct, and that by pushing the person into continuing the affair it can constitute an invasion of privacy—especially if one tries to make it happen at the person’s house where she does not want it….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Definition Of Invasion Of Privacy In Workplace Affair" (2022, October 31) Retrieved June 4, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/definition-invasion-privacy-workplace-affair-2178947

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Definition Of Invasion Of Privacy In Workplace Affair" 31 October 2022. Web.4 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/definition-invasion-privacy-workplace-affair-2178947>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Definition Of Invasion Of Privacy In Workplace Affair", 31 October 2022, Accessed.4 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/definition-invasion-privacy-workplace-affair-2178947