Descartes: Why God Is Not Term Paper

Total Length: 841 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 3



This raises several questions, however. For instance, is it acceptable that a person only deceives another if he is weak or malicious? or, can a person not deceive another person even if he is more powerful, and/or even if she is not being malicious? Cannot it not be that there exists a more powerful, and non-malicious, deceiver?

So basically, for Descartes, God is an entity that cannot lack in anything; and as deceiving means to lack certain positive qualities, he cannot possibly be a deceiver as he does not lack.

This viewpoint dovetails nicely with Plato's republic and the Cave allegory in that it presents a very black-and-white depiction of God and God's abilities, virtues and perfection.

That is why Descartes is unique: He paints for us a simple view of God in some ways.

The Counter-Point

One may argue against Descartes on the idea that evil may well be a quality in itself, as opposed to simply the lack of the quality of goodness.

Basically, the argument here is that negative space - in its lack of foundation and being - actually constitutes space. Perhaps evil is actually a quality, and since God has every quality - not just those we ignorantly assume are positive - he is evil as well; and since those who are evil deceive, God deceives.


By making this argument, the person puts a hole in Descartes' logic: Who are we to assume which qualities are positive and negative; and which are simple lacks of other positive qualities?

Even if it is allowed that evil is only the lack of goodness, however, the logical flow of the position still is based upon the truth of premise that deception is an evil. This belief still requires that we as humans agree that deception is evil. And as established above, this view may be hotly contested. Indeed, perhaps some forms of deception - a surprise birthday party, for instance -- are not evil.

In Descartes Medications, as the notion of the will to deceive linked to "weakness" waxes vague, it is possible to consider the claim that the will to deceive is linked to maliciousness. There are two possible counter-arguments here: (1) a person may have the will to deceive another without being malicious; and (2) a person may have the will to deceive another while being benevolent.

But at its most basic form, the arguments against Descartes' views are founded in precisely what makes them strong:….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Descartes Why God Is Not" (2005, June 05) Retrieved June 5, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/descartes-god-65078

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Descartes Why God Is Not" 05 June 2005. Web.5 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/descartes-god-65078>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Descartes Why God Is Not", 05 June 2005, Accessed.5 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/descartes-god-65078