Economy Bailout Too Big to Research Proposal

Total Length: 1168 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 5

Page 1 of 4

In less than a year, the federal government has given over one trillion dollars to large corporations that pay many executives millions of dollars a year despite their failure to run the companies in a proper and sustainable fashion, and in most cases without any form of repayment or any compensation for the taxpayer's money. Meanwhile, discussion of spending less than a trillion dollars over a ten-year period to ensure that these same taxpayers have access to affordable quality healthcare is decried as undue government spending and intervention. In short, taxpayers can be used to support giant corporations and their executives who are cutting pension and healthcare benefits, but one tenth of that amount cannot be used to provide the same healthcare -- and let's not even get started on the Social Security issue (Krugman 2009).

It has been claimed, and reasonably so, that economic decentralization can cause enormous macroeconomic havoc, and that for this reason federally funded bailouts make for sound fiscal policy (Wildasin 2001). This may be so, but it does not preclude the idea of corporate responsibility to the government or the taxpayers that fund it. In fact, such responsibility would be a natural assumption in any privately-funded merger, acquisition, or loan -- whichever construct one would like to apply to the bailout, in the private sector it would necessarily entail either interest payments or control of the company receiving the bailout funds.

Stuck Writing Your "Economy Bailout Too Big To" Research Proposal?



The Auto Industry

The bailouts given to General Motors and Chrysler did include provisions for government responsiveness, and the federal government played a large role in reorganizing these companies as a part of the bailout deal, which is the major reason that Ford decided to go without additional federal aid (Business Week 2009). Even the massive amounts of money that these companies received, however, did not give the government or the public the amount of interest in the company that such a large amount of funds warranted, nor did it prevent executives at these companies from receiving large salaries while other employees had their pensions cut and feared losing their jobs. Again, the point of the bailouts was to prevent massive unemployment in one of the few large manufacturing industries still operating in this country, but if the companies were not able to run themselves in a manner that was able to keep them afloat, the least they could offer in return for the government bailout is a gesture of solidarity in reducing executive compensation.

Conclusion

These bailouts, though perhaps forestalling an even greater recession, did so without any real and immediate benefit to the taxpayers. The lesson seems to be that if your are rich enough and well-connected, screwing up doesn't cost you a dime -- there's a government just waiting to foot the bill......

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Economy Bailout Too Big To" (2009, October 17) Retrieved April 28, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/economy-bailout-too-big-18545

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Economy Bailout Too Big To" 17 October 2009. Web.28 April. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/economy-bailout-too-big-18545>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Economy Bailout Too Big To", 17 October 2009, Accessed.28 April. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/economy-bailout-too-big-18545