Employee Empowerment Chapter

Total Length: 1531 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 5

Empowering Cases

What guidelines related to empowerment were violated by Ken Hoffman? By Ruth Cummings?

If you were an outside consultant attending the meeting, what advice would you give Ken? What advice would you give Ruth?

Should this decision be made by you alone? Why or why not?

If you answered the question, "Should I involve others?" affirmatively, which alternative in Figure 8.2 should be used in making a decision? Justify your choice.

What are the most important considerations in deciding whom to involve in this task?

If others are to become involved, how much empowerment should they have? What would you do specifically to achieve the appropriate level of empowerment?

Part

What guidelines related to empowerment were violated by Ken Hoffman? By Ruth Cummings?

As discussed in the case, Hoffman and Cummins seems to have both violated several of the informal guidelines that foster empowerment. The first case was on the part of Hoffman as she did not clearly state the goals and objectives of the company. As is evident from the case of the regular buyer who wanted to be billed more than $3,000, Cummins did not allow the customer to make the purchase. Hoffman possibly had not made it clear to Cummings that the primary objective of the company was allow for sales and to ensure customer satisfaction. Cummings did not allow the customer as it was not a rule to allow such a big billing at a regional store. Therefore the customer had to waste time to go to the main store to make the purchase and the company was frustrated for Cummings following rules of the company and not allowing the customer to make the purchase. Hoffman also should have made it clear to Cummings that customer satisfaction was the ultimate goal which led to better sales.

Another shortcoming for Hoffman was that she did not allow the fostering of the personal mastery of individuals of dealing with problems to excel. Whenever Cummings tried to take advantage of situation and tried to master a problem, Hoffman reprimanded her reminded her of the rules and the norms of the company. In the case where Cummings tried to solve the problem of managing the inventory Hoffman intervened and accused her not consulting the seniors on the issue. This was violation of the accepted norms of empowerment by Hoffman.

Hoffman violated another empowering norm. She, in all probability, encouraged others to develop negative feelings getting in the mind of Cummings. By the way she confronted Cummings twice for something that Cummings did for the betterment of the company and criticized her for not following the norms of the company is bound to instill some negative emotions in the mind of Cummings. These probably resulted in Cummings not taking the decision of allowing the customer in making a billing of $3,000 following the rules of the company as she was pulled up and criticized for not following the company norms on two earlier occasions. Moreover, Hoffman accused Cummings of neglecting the headquarters in making decisions which would negatively impact on the mind of Cummings.

Norms of empowering was violated by Hoffman when she did not provide the requisite resources to Cummings who required an assistant to look after the inventory so that she could look after the more critical aspects of business like sales, promotion and marketing. On the contrary Cummings was pulled up for not having consulted the head office before making the appointment of the staff that looked after inventory at a salary that was a little more than the best paid sales staff.

Hoffman failed to connect to the outcome of the decision and the work of Cummings on two occasions. In the case of inventory assistant and the TV show, both the actions were made in the wider interest of the company but Hoffman failed to understand and connect to the outcome of the actions.

The first two incidents where Cummings was pulled up by Hoffman did nothing to install confidence. This is another norm of empowerment that Hoffman violated.

If you were an outside consultant attending the meeting, what advice would you give Ken? What advice would you give Ruth?

As an outside consultant, my advice to Ruth would be to get clear directives from Ruth about what the boundaries of her actions would be with respect to the issues that have come up in the case. Ruth needs to get it clear about whether she follows the company norms or she takes decisions to foster the interests of the company.


Ken on the other hand, has to make it clear to Ruth about the areas and subjects that she can have independence in taking decisions so that there is not more confusion about the right sand empowerment of Ruth.

Part 2

Should this decision be made by you alone? Why or why not?

The discussion should be made with the team members. The reasons for this is that that the team leader alone does not have requisite expertise to efficiently prepare the report. While he is an expert in one subject, there are other areas that need expert advice in the report. There are experts in the requisite fields in the team who can be used. The attitude of the team is a bit of a problem when it comes to agreeing to one solution on the best ways of investing. However as the team leader, one can take measures to incapacitate the ill effects of the bickering among the team members. The team leader does not have any personal insecurity from the team members and there is no dearth of trust of the team leader on the abilities of the team and their skills and expertise on the subject. Therefore the team leader should discuss the issues with the team members to resolve it efficiently.

If you answered the question, "Should I involve others?" affirmatively, which alternative in Figure 8.2 should be used in making a decision? Justify your choice.

Having decided to approach and include the team members into the discussions for the preparation of the report, it is crucial when to include the team members into the discussion for the preparation of the report. It is established that the subordinates have the required expertise to take part in the discussions. The subordinates also do not have noted conflict about commitment to the organization. It is not advised that the subordinates be formed into a group as they tend to disagree on subjects. The decision making ability should remain with the team leader to keep control over the situation and the final conclusions of the report. The team should be delegated the work singularly according to the personal expertise of the individual team members. This is because the team members do not agree among themselves about various issues including the best ways to invest. The leader needs to motivate the subordinates through interaction and any disagreements during the individual discussion would probably lead to better solutions.

What are the most important considerations in deciding whom to involve in this task?

While having decided to include the subordinates in the discussion process, it is important to decide who would be involved in the process. The critical questions to ask is would subordinates be consulted a steam or should they be discussed singularly. As is disclosed in the case, the team members and the subordinates quarrel among themselves and are often not able to agree to the best method of invest. Therefore involving a group in the discussion is not feasible as they would probably not be able to come to a proper decision and there would be chaos. Therefore it is suggested that the manager should consult and delegate each of the subordinate separately and engage with each of the subordinate singularly. Thus should be decided on the personal skills and expertise of each of the individual team members. However the final decision on the subject is to be taken by the team leader after considering the views of the subordinate taken seriously.

If others are to become involved, how much empowerment should they have? What would you do specifically to achieve the appropriate level of empowerment?

In the case at hand, others -- the subordinates have been involved in the empowerment process. In this is preparing the financial report, the team leader has decided to involve the subordinates though not as a team but as separate individuals. The empowerment levels should be limited to the degree of expertise that the subordinates have. Moreover the attitude of the others needs to be taken into account. Such attitude would include outlook to the job, commitment to the organization and working as a team member.

To achieve the appropriate level of empowerment, it is recommended that the other involved in the process be granted a degree of freedom to making decision as is warranted for the betterment of the decision. If it is considered that the others are not capable to arrive at a….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Organization Development Culture and Employee Empowerment

a survey of over 300 employees in one major organization found that employee empowerment in their respective roles was positively correlated with organizational agility, with empowerment being defined in terms of knowledge access, trust, motivation, and communication. Research on the relationship between employee motivation and organizational outcomes therefore begins with operationalization of the definitions of motivation and empowerment, as well as defining the terms of organizational success. Empowerment and motivation will manifest differently for different people, just as different organizations will define their success or outcome objectives differently depending on overall mission and vision. Communication as a Component in Employee Motivation If… Continue Reading...

Ergonomics and Human Factors

acquire recognition, influence others, and gain social status. On the other hand, Fernandez, & Moldogaziev, (2015) argue that employee empowerment is an effective strategy to improve employees' motivation, which assists in improving service quality, increase customer satisfaction and promote innovation. The authors further point out that empowerment practice promotes self-determination, and enhancing positive job satisfaction. In a business environment, empowerment is a business practice that involves granting a person power or granting authority to an individual to do what is necessary. Empowerment is also to entrust an employee the power to make a right choice without waiting for management approval. (Evans, 2016). The goal of empowerment is to… Continue Reading...

Managing Quality Safety and Individual Performance in Healthcare

continuous improvement of an organization's products and processes. The philosophy espouses five major principles: customer focus, management commitment, employee empowerment, continuous improvement, and evidence-based decision making (Kaynak & Rogers, 2013). The element of customer-focus means that every decision an organization makes and process it undertakes is geared towards creating value for the customer. From strategic planning and personnel management to product decisions, the organization places the customer above everything else. Management commitment is about the management of the organization mobilizing and providing the necessary resources as well as creating and maintaining a culture of quality improvement. Indeed, a culture of quality improvement is an important element of quality… Continue Reading...

Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Ethics

The rationale behind the corporate policy on employee empowerment and engagement is linked to the fact that when employees are engaged at the workplace setting, they end up feeling and having a connection with the connection. It brings a sense of what they are doing in the corporation is important and therefore opt to work harder. This is in alignment with the culture in terms of reducing employee turnover, increasing employee commitment and also increasing employee productivity (Albrech, 2011). · The rationale behind the corporate policy on collaboration and leadership development is linked to the fact that… Continue Reading...

Shared Values and Diverse Ideas in Healthcare Environment

ideas encourages creativity and innovation, which can in turn drive organisational performance (Yang & Konrad, 2011; Bell, 2012). Diversity is crucial for not only organisational performance, but also employee empowerment and motivation. When organisational members are given an opportunity to contribute their ideas, they feel appreciated, acknowledged, and valued (Danowitz, Hanappi-Egger & Mensi-Klarbach, 2012). This can increase employee commitment, loyalty, and satisfaction. While shared values are important, they can often hinder diversity. The presence of shared values means that conflicting ideas may not be embraced. As organisational members are bound by a shared purpose and commonly agreed procedures, diverse perspectives may not thrive. Indeed, shared values and diverse ideas may often appear to be in conflict. In a… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Employee Empowerment" (2015, April 20) Retrieved May 20, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/employee-empowerment-2150299

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Employee Empowerment" 20 April 2015. Web.20 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/employee-empowerment-2150299>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Employee Empowerment", 20 April 2015, Accessed.20 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/employee-empowerment-2150299