Employment at Will Case Study

Total Length: 617 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1

Page 1 of 2

Retaliation for Whistle Blowing and At Will Employees

Waddell vs. Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Inc.

In the case Waddell v. Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Waddell sued for wrongful termination claiming that his dismissal violated his contract. He was an at-will employee, however, and there were no clear guidelines regarding termination; thus, the court found that Waddell did not present a proper claim for breach of contract. The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the lower court and argued that Waddell did not make a proper claim.

While I agree technically with the court’s decision, I disagree with the spirit of the ruling. Waddell was possibly fired because his boss did not like that Waddell was calling her out for being late with financial filings. There could have been fraud involved. Waddell should have sued for wrongful termination based on violation of the whistleblower policy that the company had instituted. The court ruled against Waddell because he failed to properly make an effective claim. What bothers me is that everyone can probably see what the proper claim should have been—so why can’t they just address the claim and change it so that it works? Then the court could rule in his favor. I do not think it is to the keeping of the spirit of the law to rule against someone based on a technicality like this when the evidence suggests that the person suing does have a valid claim.
Just because it was worded incorrectly should not be a reason to dismiss the suit altogether.

If Waddell had…

[…… parts of this paper are missing, click here to view the entire document ]

…the employment at will is fair to employees because employees are not indentured servants or slaves, and if they want to leave a job, they can. If the contract forbade them from doing this it would mean that the employee was basically an indentured servant or slave. Employees are not going to like that kind of arrangement in most cases because it can lead to them being taken advantage of and abused. Employees want freedom in terms of where they work and who they work for. The best case for employers and employees is to have at-will employment as both are free to walk away at any time if they feel the contract is not working for them. It may not seem fair at times, but it is the best option considering the other alternatives….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Labor Laws and Employment Contracts

the Employment-at-will doctrine. These exceptions include all situations in which the employment at will doctrine may not apply. The first exception to the employment-at-will doctrine is in cases where employees and employers have collective bargaining agreements. Employees who are members of the worker's unions have pre-negotiated collective bargaining agreements between the employer and the employee. These agreements stipulate the employee remunerations and increment procedure. Such agreements also outline conditions under which an employee may be discharged. The collective bargaining agreements further cover an appeal procedure through which an employee can appeal if he or she feels the termination of their employment… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
" Employment At Will" (2020, November 04) Retrieved April 28, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/employment-2175734

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
" Employment At Will" 04 November 2020. Web.28 April. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/employment-2175734>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
" Employment At Will", 04 November 2020, Accessed.28 April. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/employment-2175734