Employment Law Term Paper

Total Length: 1257 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 4

Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services

STATUATE SUMMARY

The case presents the question whether workplace harassment violates Title VII's prohibition to "discriminate . . . because of . . . sex" when the harasser and the harassed employee are of the same sex.

COURT DECISION BRIEF

The Petitioner, Joseph Oncale worked as a roustabout on an eight-man crew for Sundowner Offshore Services on a Chevron U.S.A oil platform in the Gulf of Mexico from August to November 1991. The crew included the respondents, John Lyons, Danny Pippen, and Brandon Johnson.

Lyons, Pippen and Johnson on several occasions, forcibly subjected Oncale to sex-related, humiliating actions in the presence of the rest of the crew. Pippen and Lyons also physically assaulted Oncale in a sexual manner, and Lyons threatened him with rape. Specifically, Lyons placed his penis on Oncale's neck on one occasion and on his arm on another occasion. Lyons also forcefully pushed a bar of soap into Oncale's anus while Pippen restrained Oncale as he was showering on Sundowner premises. ("Oncale v Sundowner ... " Equal Rights Advocate 2005)

Oncale complained to company's supervisory personnel but to no avail. In fact, Sundowner's Safety Compliance Clerk told Oncale that Lyons and Pippen picked on him too, calling him a name that suggested homosexuality. Oncale finally quit his job, requesting that his pink slip indicate that he voluntarily left due to sexual harassment and verbal abuse. During his deposition, Oncale stated: "I felt that if I didn't leave my job, I would be raped or forced to have sex."

Joseph Oncale filed a Title VII action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The District Court, relying on the Fifth Circuit's decision in Garcia v. Elf Atochem North America (1994) held that "... A male, has no cause of action under Title VII for harassment by male co-workers.
" On appeal, the Fifth Circuit affirmed. Oncale filed his petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, which was granted by the Court.

In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court held that discrimination "based on ... sex" even if consisting of same-sex sexual harassment is actionable under Title VII. The Court thus reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and the case was remanded to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. ("U.S. Supreme Court No. 96-568," 1998-Text of judgment from FindLaw)

IMPLICATIONS ANALYSIS

Being the first case in which same-sex sexual harassment was held actionable under Title VII, Oncale v Sundowner is considered to be a landmark ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to Oncale, the state and federal courts in the United States had taken "a bewildering array of stances" while ruling in sexual harassment cases. Some decisions, like Garcia v. Elf Atochem North America, flatly rejected the application of Title VII to same-sex sexual harassment. Others, like McWilliams v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors (CA 4, 1996) ruled that claims of same-sex sexual harassment are actionable only if the plaintiff can prove that the harasser is homosexual. Still others suggested that workplace harassment that is sexual in content is always actionable, regardless of the harasser's sex, sexual orientation, or motivations. ("U.S. Supreme Court No. 96-568," 1998)

Hence, the decision in Oncale at least made one thing clear: Title VII applied to same sex sexual harassment. It also clarified that sexual orientation of the harassed or the harasser was not an issue in cases of sexual harassment. The parties involved may be heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual and whether the motivation behind same-sex harassment is sexual desire or not; if sexual harassment has taken place, it is actionable under Title VII.

The ruling clarified that recognizing.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Employment Laws in the United Kingdom

in this report were pass nearly a generation apart, both of them hold a very important place in the employment law paradigm in the United Kingdom. Employment Rights Act of 1996 Scope & Summary There are several important requirements and regulations when it comes to the Employment Rights Act of 1996. When an employee starts work with an employer, they are obligated to get a summary of terms and requirements. As stated by the law itself, there are five main requirements lettered one through five. First, an employer is to give the employee a written statement with the particulars about the employment contract and duties. The statement, as mentioned… Continue Reading...

Obesity and Fatness in America Body Image

employment law condemns discrimination based on race, sex, color and age, nevertheless, the law does not prohibit "employers from discriminating based on physical appearance" making some people to believe that employers are focusing hiring mainly the good looking people.[footnoteRef:7] Thus, the advocates for the overweight are lobbying to prevent employment discrimination based on the physical appearance. Steven further reveals that many obese people are unable to win the court case because there is no clause in the Disability Act that cites a discrimination based on physical appearance.[footnoteRef:8] Thus, when obese… Continue Reading...

Company Progressive Discipline Policy

in a manner that is consistent with the company’s values, employment laws, and best practices in human resource management. Procedure Step 1 – Verbal Warning A manager, supervisor or human resource professional will issue a verbal warning to an employee privately in case of violation of company policy or in the event of an undesirable behavior/action in the workplace (Workable, 2017). When providing the warning, the employee will also be provided with necessary coaching or advice regarding the company’s progressive discipline steps. A written documentation will then be created by the supervisor within five working days of the verbal warning,… Continue Reading...

External Business Environment from 3 Squares Restaurant

Increased concerns about the calorie content of each food mean the restaurant has to shy away from high-calorie foods. Employment laws relating to employees safety and rights: The adoption of the Affordable Care Act means that the restaurant will have to provide health benefits to full-time employees; failure to this adoption risks the restaurant a $2,000 fine. Others include EEO, the right to work, wage and hours, and whistleblower laws (Blumenthal & Collins, 2014). Evolving dietary guidelines implies that the 3 Squares Restaurant will have to modify restaurants and adapt portion sizes consistently. In 2015, for example, the Food and Drug Administration agency created a policy to remove hydrogenated… Continue Reading...

Recruitment Plan and Staffing Plan at Amazon

organization. Legal Considerations Recruitment and staffing strategies must comply with local, state, and federal regulations related to non-discrimination and other federal employment laws governed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. When designing the job description and terms of the contract, Amazon will also need to investigate obligations to the worker regarding worker compensation and benefits packages, and wage disclosure laws. Using social media during the recruitment process can raise legal red flags due to the potential for conscious or unconscious discrimination based on age, race, gender, and other characteristics (Calvasina, Calvasina & Calvasina, 2014). Discrimination could also potentially impact perceptions of the candidate’s competency, impacting salary negotiations. Therefore, social media should… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Employment Law" (2005, September 16) Retrieved May 14, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/employment-law-68749

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Employment Law" 16 September 2005. Web.14 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/employment-law-68749>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Employment Law", 16 September 2005, Accessed.14 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/employment-law-68749