Engineering Ethics -- Case Study: Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 738 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 2

If Liz is supportive of the CDC plan, she has a greater duty to disclose her situation to the Committee. If Liz cannot make a full-faith effort on behalf of the Committee because of her concerns about her employment, she must disclose her concerns to the Committee. Likewise, if Liz cannot fulfill her work responsibilities because of her personal beliefs and association with the Committee, Liz has an obligation to notify CDC so that they can appoint someone without any such conflicts to perform the role for which Liz would have been responsible. Liz may not remain silent and simply shirk (or fake) her performance in the CDC effort.

Liz has every right to oppose the CDC project in her personal time although from a practical matter, it may cost her the job. The safest alternative course of action for Liz might have been to simply respond truthfully that she is well acquainted with the city council because she had previously been very active in opposing commercial projects in her home area. She could have assured her employers that she would not divulge CDC information to the Committee or violate any of her vocational responsibilities, but that it would probably be more in CDC's interests to have someone who is not personally opposed to the project conduct any lobbying of the city council and allow her to focus on projects that do not pose any conflicts of interest.

Stuck Writing Your "Engineering Ethics -- Case Study:" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Engineering Ethics -- Case Study: Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written



If David had no knowledge of Liz's personal feelings about commercial development in Parkville and only mean that he would like her to promote the CDC project to the city council, David did not violate any ethical principles. Had he been aware that Liz had any authority or influence over the city council and meant for her to misuse that authority or influence on behalf of CDC, then David would have not been acting ethically. Finally, Jim did not act ethically when he instructed David to make sure that Liz "cools it on this one" because Jim and CDC have no authority over Liz's private conduct outside of the workplace......

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Engineering Ethics -- Case Study " (2010, April 18) Retrieved May 21, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/engineering-ethics-case-study-12929

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Engineering Ethics -- Case Study " 18 April 2010. Web.21 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/engineering-ethics-case-study-12929>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Engineering Ethics -- Case Study ", 18 April 2010, Accessed.21 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/engineering-ethics-case-study-12929
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example