Escalating Commitment As the Reason for Polaroid's Failure Essay

Total Length: 807 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 3

Business Studies

What Caused Polaroid's Bankruptcy in 2001?

In 2001 Polaroid filed for bankruptcy. The circumstances surrounding the bankruptcy indicate several potential reasons, including poor management decision making and escalating commitment. The financial management of the firm appears to have been questionable in the year before the filing; a special bonus of $1.4 million was paid to the CEO Gary DiCamillo, and other board members received payments f between $63,000 and $272,000 (TParadiso, 2003). The payments were not illegal, but it is notable that the $1.4 million bonus for DiCamillo would not have been received if 6 months prior the auditor KPMG LLP had not been persuaded to refrain from issuing a going concern warning on the annual accounts (TParadiso, 2003). These actions may all appear questionable, especially the action of DiCamillio calling KMPG's CEO in order to ensure the going concern warring was not issued, but whatever the view, these do not appear to be responsible for the bankruptcy. The firm filed for bankruptcy as it did not have enough cash to survive; the firm could not pay its debts, and had a total of $1 billion of long-term debt (Rifkin, 2002). The debt was unaffordable due to the fall in sales and profit.

Stuck Writing Your "Escalating Commitment As the Reason for Polaroid's Failure" Essay?

This leaves one to question what happened that resulted in the firm's financial difficulties.

Polaroid was well-known for cameras, film and photographic paper. The firm was also undertaking research and development, and had developed digital camera technology in the 1980's. However, despite the firm development of the technology, making it a potential front runner, the firm did not bring the digital photographic technology to the market. The firm was heavily invested in the film market, and the digital cameras did not need film. The move to digital cameras may have appeared one that would undermine one of the firm most important markets, costing them film sales.

Digital cameras can be seen as a type of disruptive innovation; a new product that would disrupt the existing market. Although the firm appears to show some commitment to the research and development, there are delays and the firm holds back from launching the product even when it was ready in 1992 (Sandstrom, Magnusson, & Jornmark, 2009). There appears to be a belief on the part of Polaroid that there will continue to be a demand for the traditional photographic products (Sandstrom et al., 2009). The firm did not.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Escalating Commitment As The Reason For Polaroid's Failure" (2014, May 02) Retrieved May 22, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/escalating-commitment-reason-polaroid-failure-188796

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Escalating Commitment As The Reason For Polaroid's Failure" 02 May 2014. Web.22 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/escalating-commitment-reason-polaroid-failure-188796>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Escalating Commitment As The Reason For Polaroid's Failure", 02 May 2014, Accessed.22 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/escalating-commitment-reason-polaroid-failure-188796