Ethical Dilemmas of Fannie Mae Case Study

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1320 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 5

Page 1 of 4

Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility Page |

Fannie Mae

Outside Evaluation Related to Corporate Governance and Business Ethics

Corporate social responsibility is the corporate conscience of the company that provides corporate self-regulation combined with business models (D Wood, 1991). The CSR policy framework provides guidelines for businesses to have active compliance with the corporate laws, ethical standards and international norms if the company is doing business globally. The objective of CSR policy guideline is to encourage company towards activities that supports positive work environment, consumer care, employee development, community responsibility, stakeholders concerns and external public affair. CSR proactively augment the public interest (PI) by encouraging community growth and development, and voluntarily eliminate actions that harm the public interest, regardless of legality (Saether, Kim T. & Ruth V. Aguilera, 2008). The corporate social responsibility is the model of Creating Shared Value. The shared value model is built on the idea that corporate success and social welfare are interdependent concepts. A business needs a healthy, educated workforce, sustainable resources and adept government to compete effectively (Porter M.E & Kramer M.R.). Lot of companies applies the strategy of benchmarking to compete in the industry in CSR policy formulation, implementation, and effectiveness. Benchmarking involves reviewing competitor CSR initiatives, as well as measuring and evaluating the impact these policies have on society and the environment, and how customers understands competitor's CSR strategy. Outside or external evaluation of the company sets this benchmark and compares it with the internal assessment of the company. However, for ethical business operation it is very important for the company to set its ration based on transparent accounting practices adopted.

2. Fannie Mae's Financial Misrepresentation and Barnes Response

Fannie Mae was found to ignore the financial reporting standards and market practices for the purpose of gaining their desired level of profits per year and targeted EPS which was set to be $6.24 by 2005. In this respect the areas identified by Roger Barnes, employee in the Controller office had investigated certain flaws and put it forward for management concern.

Stuck Writing Your "Ethical Dilemmas of Fannie Mae" Case Study?

View All Our Example Ethical Dilemmas of Fannie Mae Case Study

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

But all his investigations were ignored by the management until it was identified by local newspaper and OFHEO reports, but by then he had left the company. The areas of financial reporting flaws were identified: Profits and losses on high risk derivative instruments were kept off the books by treating them as hedges. This decision was taken by the company without taking into consideration whether such treatment qualifies under accounting rules for exemptions from earnings statements. The result was that these losses were eventually brought back into earnings with a multibillion impact when these types of risky instruments were uncovered in 2005.

The other area which was identified was over the amortization policies. The aspect of amortization in financial reporting is very critical areas it reflects the profitability and capability of the company to bear financial losses in future. Fannie Mae's amortization policies were not in accordance with the GAAP. The amortization policies were depended on the computerized model that would shorten the time of loan in order to increase earnings and company's performance with higher yields.

No steps were taken by Fannie Mae's management in response to the alert given by Roger Barnes based on his investigation and Ethics and compliance office had turned deaf ear to this investigation. The primary purpose of this department was to defend the company from any allegations and suits by employees. They were not providing complete information to the audit committee for further investigation and the issue was not taken seriously until it came black and white in local newspapers and OFHEO reports.

Socially responsible firm's foremost duty is to taking into consideration all the justified and legal means of business operation and brings to public notice if any anti-social or anti-economical activity is come across the business operation. Instead of concealing it in four walls of business entity it should be brought to public notice (Gray, R.H. Owen D.L. & Maunders, K.T. 1987).….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ethical Dilemmas Of Fannie Mae" (2011, October 21) Retrieved June 25, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/ethical-dilemmas-fannie-mae-116636

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ethical Dilemmas Of Fannie Mae" 21 October 2011. Web.25 June. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/ethical-dilemmas-fannie-mae-116636>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ethical Dilemmas Of Fannie Mae", 21 October 2011, Accessed.25 June. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/ethical-dilemmas-fannie-mae-116636
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example