Ethical Philosophies Ethics Utilitarianism, Kant's Categorical Imperative, Essay

Total Length: 765 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 3

Ethical Philosophies

Ethics

Utilitarianism, Kant's categorical imperative, virtue ethics, and Confucianism

One of the most intuitive ethical philosophies is that of utilitarianism, an ethical ideal that suggests that ethical decisions should be made based upon what decisions will achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people. When we weigh decisions based upon their costs and benefits, we are taking a kind of utilitarian approach to decision-making (Ethics 5: Utilitarianism, 2008). Utilitarianism attempts to rationally calculate what will maximize pleasure and minimize pain: it does not view any action as inherently good or bad but rather focuses on the practical consequences of our decisions. It seeks to maximize utility, whether this is happiness for the individual or profit for a business. One of the obvious detriments of utilitarian theory is that many decisions often have a very negative impact upon a minority of people. Another problem is defining what constitutes 'the good' that is being accomplished. Ideally, all persons should be assessed who may be affected by the action, not simply 'the self,' and the long-term consequences of actions should be taken into consideration (Ethics 5: Utilitarianism, 2008).

Stuck Writing Your "Ethical Philosophies Ethics Utilitarianism, Kant's Categorical Imperative," Essay?



In stark contrast to utilitarian theory is Kant's categorical imperative. Kantian philosophy stresses the need for ethical actors to focus upon the moral worth of actions, not the consequences of actions. The end never justifies the means. Certain moral laws must always be obeyed. Moreover, every ethical actor should always behave as if he or she is setting a moral law for all time. There are no situational or contextual exceptions (Three-minute philosophy: Immanuel Philosophy, 2009). You should always behave as if you are setting moral laws for all time and not try to rationalize acting against those moral laws with imagined consequences. The obvious problem with Kant's inflexibility is that different people and different societies have different rules for morality. Additionally, sometimes acting according to what would be considered a universal moral law (such as not to lie, cheat or steal) can have very negative consequences, both for the self and the rest of society.

In contrast to both of these worldviews stands Aristotle's virtue ethics, which stresses on the need to have a good moral character rather than to obey unyielding principles about maximizing utility or.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ethical Philosophies Ethics Utilitarianism Kant's Categorical Imperative " (2012, November 29) Retrieved May 4, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/ethical-philosophies-ethics-utilitarianism-106546

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ethical Philosophies Ethics Utilitarianism Kant's Categorical Imperative " 29 November 2012. Web.4 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/ethical-philosophies-ethics-utilitarianism-106546>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ethical Philosophies Ethics Utilitarianism Kant's Categorical Imperative ", 29 November 2012, Accessed.4 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/ethical-philosophies-ethics-utilitarianism-106546