Ethical Responses to NSW Case Scenarios Essay

Total Length: 1789 words ( 6 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 6

Page 1 of 6

School A has set up Facebook page courtesy of parents and friends of the school. It has gained several commentators and followers that include several members of the teaching staff. A teacher here referred to as teacher B. who is new on the staff at the beginning of the year has joined the fray. In the second term of the year, the school head bans games and sports activity before class hour. He explains that students need to be energized and ready for studies and not tired as a result of active sports Teacher B. isn't happy with the decision by the head. The decision also draws lots of negative interest and response on the school's Facebook page. It first starts with criticism of the head's decision but evolves to include many other complaints about the principal and the school. The grappling question at this point is: what is the suitable advice for teacher B?

Competing Values of Each Issue:

The most significant problem in this case is that teacher B. disagrees with the decision by the school principal. Secondly, there is the issue of Facebook and whether it is appropriate for teacher B. to post comments regarding the issue. It is normal for teachers and principals to disagree because they subscribe to varying convictions and perspectives. It is important for the principals to view matters holistically. Teachers tend to have a limited view that predominantly focuses on their subject area and responsibility at an institution. Every principal often makes decisions that will rub some members of staff the wrong way (Disagreeing with the Principal - eduflow). The decisions may touch in such areas as daily duties, curriculum, procedures, discipline, policy or the evaluation of teachers' performance. The dilemma is what to do with a member of the teaching team that disagrees with the decision made by the head of the school. Available literature on best practice suggests a level of agreement regarding the treatment of such a case.

The Range of Possible Actions and the Teaching Practice Implications

I would advise teacher B. to evolve a way of learning how to disagree with the school head and still maintain a healthy working relationship. Principals are impressed with teachers who are focused on their duties at school and those that are willing to carry an extra load just to make the school better. Principals also hold in high esteem and trust teachers who are courageous enough to disagree with them and explain their disagreements directly to them as opposed to those who engage in grapevine activity (Disagreeing with the Principal - eduflow).

Stuck Writing Your "Ethical Responses to NSW Case Scenarios" Essay?

I would advise teacher B. to discuss their disagreement with the principal in a private forum. It is also important for the teacher to use an impersonal and non-judgmental method in dealing with the boss. The teacher should be frank and objective. Provide concrete reasons for your disagreement and suggest another solution to the heads concern. It would be wrong to fight the principal in public forums. In case the head asks for comments in a staff meeting on the decision they have made, it is okay to launch your comments and objections constructively in such a staff meeting. However, if you have strong emotions about the decision, it is a better approach to go to the heads office and seek private audience with them. Indeed, it would be prudent to seize the moment to request for a private meet with the head to ventilate on the matter in depth. Avoid trying to undermine the heads authority just because you disagree with the decision they have made. Such a move would lead to severe conflict and aggravate the matter unnecessarily. Teachers are accountable to and subject to the CEOs order. They also exercise authority on behalf of the CEO. Teachers are expected to implement government policies and support government educational programs at school level. Such programs must be implemented without favor. They must also keep clear records of their decisions (TEACHERS' CODE OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE). Therefore, from the foregoing, his would be the most significant implication in relation to the case at hand.

Case Study 2


On an early Monday morning, John shows up at school with raised welts on the back of his legs. When the classroom teacher questions him, he explains that on Saturday, his father hit him with his belt because he discovered that he had used his computer without permission John explained that he had normalized relations with his dad by the end of the weekend. In the afternoon, John's mother showed up to pick him. Teacher C. asked her about John's mother. John's mother told off teacher C. to mind his own business and never again to ask John about what….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


(n.d.). Eduflow - This site is dedicated to education, philosophy, spirituality, leadership, management, social commentary and self-actualization. Disagreeing with the Principal - eduflow. Retrieved September 22, 2016, from

(n.d.). Home - American School Counselor Association (ASCA). Personal Judgment in Reporting Abuse - American School Counselor Association (ASCA). Retrieved September 22, 2016, from

(n.d.). Home - Education Directorate. TEACHERS' CODE OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE. Retrieved September 22, 2016, from

Walsh, K., Farrell, A., & Schweitzer, R. (2005). - Share research. Critical factors in teachers' detecting and reporting child abuse and neglect: Implications for practice - Robert Schweitzer and Ruth Bridgstock - Retrieved September 22, 2016, from

(n.d.). Welcome to Elementary Education on How Teachers Should Report Suspected Abuse of Children. Retrieved September 22, 2016, from

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ethical Responses To NSW Case Scenarios" (2016, September 26) Retrieved April 6, 2020, from

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ethical Responses To NSW Case Scenarios" 26 September 2016. Web.6 April. 2020. <>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ethical Responses To NSW Case Scenarios", 26 September 2016, Accessed.6 April. 2020,