Ethics and Morality Term Paper

Total Length: 602 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 2

Ethics & Morality

CURT RESPONSE TO STANLEY KURTZ

In the wake of Senator Rick Santorum's comments drawing a parallel between legalizing gay marriage and legalizing incest, Contributing Editor Stanley Kurtz offered his analysis of the issue of gay marriage in the April 30, 2003 issue of National Review Online.

According to Kurtz's convoluted logic, "The real danger of gay marriage is that it will undermine the taboo on adultery, thereby destroying the final bastion protecting marriage: the ethos of monogamy." Kurz, who is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, also maintains that gay marriage threatens monogamy in society because "...homosexual couples -- particularly male homosexual couples -- tend to see monogamy as nonessential, even to the most loyal and committed relationship." Finally, Kurtz suggests that legalizing gay marriage will lead society down the proverbial "slippery slope" toward legalized polygamy and polyamory, which he characterizes as undermining monogamy within heterosexual unions.


The underlying fallacy of Kurtz's first argument is that it relies on a false underlying presumption: namely, that all traditional marriages live up to the ideal of lifelong monogamy. There would seem to be anecdotal evidence all around us that monogamy is an ongoing challenge for many heterosexual couples, and instances of heterosexual infidelity hardly require any "inspiration" from gay couples. The fact of the matter is that strictly monogamous heterosexual couples (meaning where neither partner ever violates that principle even once during the entire relationship) is probably much more of an exception than the rule.

The underlying fallacy of Kurtz's second argument is the belief that it is homosexuals who prefer not to confine themselves to the constraints of monogamy, when the truth of the matter is that men are ambivalent about lifelong monogamy (at least for themselves, anyway), and not homosexual men, in particular. The….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Morality Relativism and Beliefs

about ethics and morality. As Goodman (2010) points out, relativism is not even necessarily the right way to think about conflicts in how we view the morality of actions. Context is actually more appropriate, and putting things into the right context can help people to better understand if one is being contradictory or rather if one is being discriminating. For example, Goodman (2010) states that “murder is wrong because it destroys a human subject. Warfare is not always wrong; it may be necessary to protect such subjects” (p. 88). This type… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ethics And Morality" (2004, March 24) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/ethics-morality-164079

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ethics And Morality" 24 March 2004. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/ethics-morality-164079>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Ethics And Morality", 24 March 2004, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/ethics-morality-164079