Evaluating a Health Program Term Paper

Tags: health education evaluation family therapy dementia social worker risk social work disease stress caring intervention family therapy training

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1732 words ( 6 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 4

Page 1 of 6

Alzheimer’s Intervention Evaluation

Introduction

This paper provides a basic evaluation plan for evaluating a health program for elderly patients with Alzheimer’s. The health program focuses on designing and implementing an open space concept for the patient, having a social worker regularly meet with the patient and loved one or caretakers to ensure support, having family therapy sessions available for loved ones acting as caretakers if they should want it and providing a falls prevention initiative through training in an exercise routine to strengthen the balance and agility of the elderly person—all of which are considered vital aspects to improving the health status of an elderly person with Alzheimer’s (Canning et al., 2015; Hoof, Kort, Van Warde & Blom, 2010; Rubin, 2011). The overall question an intervention evaluation asks is: Was the intervention implemented as planned? (Harris, 2010). The purpose of this paper is to provide an evaluation plan for the Health Program for Elderly Patients with Alzheimer’s.

Five Factors

The five factors that must be considered for the evaluation of the Health Program for Elderly Patients with Alzheimer’s disease are:

1. Has a falls prevention plan been initiated?

2. Has an open space room concept been implemented?

3. Has a social worker been contacted for scheduling regular visits?

4. Have family members been provided with Alzheimer’s education and access to family therapy to assist in coping with the stress of caring for a loved one with the disease?

5. Was the intended population participating as planned?

Type of Evaluation

The formative evaluation is the most appropriate type of evaluation for this health program as the evaluation is being conducted near the middle of the time allotted for the initiative to ensure that the implementation of the program has proceeded along smoothly. As Harris (2010) notes, “formative and process evaluations assess the context, the reach, the dosage, or the intensity of the initiative and the fidelity with which it is delivered. They assess the initiative at the level of resources/inputs and outputs and determine the effectiveness of the administrative functions of the program” (p. 192). The formative evaluation gives a sense of what has been done and what still needs to be done. Were the evaluation taking place at the end of the initiative, a process evaluation would be more appropriate.

Table 1. Evaluation Questions

Evaluation Questions

Formative

Outcome

Were all the components of the plan implemented?

What is the knowledge of Alzheimer’s among the participating population and what is their readiness level for dealing with Alzheimer’s?

What is the level of implementation of the Health Program (open space plan, social worker visits, family therapy, and falls prevention?

What activities have taken place to support the policy to reduce the risk of falls and confusion for the patient?

What human, financial, and material resources were provided and used?

These evaluation questions should be used to guide the formative assessment.

Stuck Writing Your "Evaluating a Health Program" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Evaluating a Health Program Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

To assist in conducting the assessment, indicators and source data have to be considered (Harris, 2010). For each formative assessment evaluation question, therefore, one must know what to look for to measure to answer the question and where that information can be found (i.e., what is the source). In…

[…… parts of this paper are missing, click here to view the entire document ]

…the subjective experience of participants data that is empirical and can be measured statistically. Both data sets will have value and give the evaluation the triangulation needed for ensuring validity and reliability.

The data should be measured against the baseline. Both posttests are likely to yield different results. The first posttest will be taken immediately after the intervention has concluded. The second posttest takes place 6 months later, so a drop-off may be expected in terms of keeping up with conditioning exercises, therapy, social work visits, etc., especially if they are no longer perceived as necessary. The main factor to be evaluated then will be attitudes towards the disease, frequency of falls to see if they are being prevented any better than at baseline, and frequency of bouts of confusion and anger to see if the open space plan has helped to create a more accommodating environment for the patient.

Reporting the Results

The last step in the evaluation process is the reporting of the results. The results of the evaluation should be communicated to the team responsible for implementing the intervention so that they can be aware of the results and obtain the necessary feedback for improving their design. At this time, recommendations for improvements are to be given based on the interpretations of the data. Questions should also be answered from the team to ensure that feedback flows go both ways.

Conclusion

The main goal of evaluating the Health Program for Elderly Patients with Alzheimer’s disease is to assess whether the intervention was implemented as planned? The original plan, therefore, has to be developed with factors that are….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


References

Canning, C. et al. (2015). Exercise for falls prevention in Parkinson disease: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology, 84(3): 304-312.

Harris, M. J. (2010). Evaluating Public and Community Health Programs, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/touromain-ebooks/detail.action?docID=484874

Hoof, J., Kort, H., Van Warde, H. & Blom, M. (2010). Environmental interventions and the design of homes for older adults with dementia: an overview. American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementia, 25(3): 202-232.

Rubin, A. (2011). Teaching EBP in social work: Retrospective and prospective. Journal
of Social Work, 11(1), 64-79.

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Evaluating A Health Program" (2018, November 30) Retrieved May 20, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/evaluating-health-program-term-paper

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Evaluating A Health Program" 30 November 2018. Web.20 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/evaluating-health-program-term-paper>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Evaluating A Health Program", 30 November 2018, Accessed.20 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/evaluating-health-program-term-paper
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example