Analysis of a Prosecution Essay

Tags: crime election jury republican party trial

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 933 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 3

The History of Crime and Punishment in the United States



1. What is the time period of your trial?



The time period of this trial is the year 1904. The defendant was tried on March 15, 1904 and indicted on November 13, 1904.



2. What is the crime on trial? Provide a brief summary.



The crime on trial is for false registration, an election offense. In the early 20th century in New York, election fraud was a serious issue and Teddy Roosevelt as a member of the Board of Commissioners at the end of the 19th century in New York had pledged to crack down on election fraud because of the stronghold on the voting process held by Tammany Hall. Thus, this trial emerged just a few short years after that crackdown began as an example of the type of issues the city was having. This case in particular centered on Edward Lawless, the defendant, charged and then indicted for false registration, an election offense. The presiding judge was John W. Goff; the defense attorney was Patrick Loftus; the prosecuting attorney was Cornelius Collins; the court was the Court of General Sessions. It is recorded on the John Jay website as Trial #414.

The defendant registered under the name of Donnelly though his name was Edward Lawless.

Stuck Writing Your "Analysis of a Prosecution" Essay?

View All Our Example Analysis of a Prosecution Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Registration in a name other than one’s own is a crime. A review of the Board of Election’s Deputy Clerk’s official records of persons registered in the Third Election District of the Fifth Assembly District showed that this was so.



3. What is the argument of the defense? Select at least two quotes to support this.



The argument of Loftus, the defense attorney, is that the witnesses represent the interests of the Republican Party and cannot be said to be trustworthy or impartial in their testimony that the defendant registered invalidly. In his cross-examination, Loftus asks: “One moment, on that day, in the Third Election District of the Fifth Assembly District, you represented one of the political parties; did you not?” and the answer of course is “Yes, sir” (The People Against Edward Lawless 1904, 20). Loftus’s main argument is that the witnesses are not impartial and therefore their testimony should not be accepted by the judge and jury. He emphasizes this point again and again: “And you are an active and enthusiastic Republican, are you no?” (The People Against Edward Lawless 1904, 20). The Court interjects and says that the Court cannot allow that question as “it matters not what party it is” (The People Against Edward Lawless 1904, 20). Still, if the defense is trying to discredit the.....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


References

The People Against Edward Lawless. (1904). Retrieved from http://www.lib.jjay.cuny.edu/crimeinny/trials/pdfs/414.pdf

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Analysis Of A Prosecution" (2018, March 27) Retrieved June 19, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/examination-of-criminal-trial-essay
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example