Fifth Amendment to the Constitution Term Paper

Total Length: 1350 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 5

Or, as Saletan points out, those three elements "by deduction, are the due process test" (2011).

But this ought to leave a bad taste in one's mouth because all three of these elements can be manipulated to violate one's due process right.

"Which leaves us with an awkward bottom line. If the target is a suspected terrorist, "imminence" can be redefined to justify killing him. If the weapon is a drone, feasibility of arrest has already been ruled out -- that's why the drone has been sent to do the job. So in any drone strike on a U.S. citizen suspected of terrorism, only one of the three questions we supposedly apply to such cases is really open: Has he been fighting alongside al-Qaida? If he has, we can kill him. That's the same rule we apply to foreigners. In effect, citizenship doesn't matter. The "due process" test is empty" (Saletan 2011).

The "due process" test is empty because the criteria have been changed. Instead of trial by jury, it's an "imminent" threat evaluation done by a group of military commanders halfway around the world. Additionally, feasibility of apprehending an individual can be arbitrarily decided and, subsequently, ruled out. One can argue that a suspected U.S.-born terrorist is too far away to send federal agents after him; therefore, it is easier (better, more cost-efficient) to send predator drones. Lastly, one can argue that even if an individual has dubious associations with terrorist organizations, the suspect is himself a terrorist.

The point is all of this rationalizing with U.S.-born, suspected terrorists leads to a sliding-scale procedural process that is not based off of justice per se (or Constitutionally enumerated rights), but based on convenience, arbitrary judgments, and cost-saving measures.

Stuck Writing Your "Fifth Amendment to the Constitution" Term Paper?

So the answer to the question of can someone's right to due process be violated, the answer is of course "yes," and all it takes to understand this is reviewing the process by which the U.S. government abrogates the rights of U.S.-born terrorists.

Now, there is no shortage of criminal cases where an individual's right to due process has been violated. In many cases, all one has to prove is that he/she was denied one of his/her substantive due process rights, i.e. jury, counsel, etc.

Justin Wolfe, a drug user who was falsely convicted of killing his drug dealer, Daniel Petrole Jr., was given habeas corpus relief because a District Court Judge found that his due process rights were violated during his trial. The Judge said that the "array of prosecutorial actions in this case 'served to deprive Wolfe of any substantive defense in a case where his life would rest on the jury's verdict.' The court, he concluded, 'finds these actions not only unconstitutional in regards to due process, but abhorrent to the judicial process.'

In other words, Wolfe's due process was violated because there were prosecutorial accusations that were used against him to unfairly influence his impartial jury. And the initial verdict (he was on death row) would have deprived him of his life.

Works.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Fifth Amendment To The Constitution" (2011, November 22) Retrieved May 18, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/fifth-amendment-constitution-47770

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Fifth Amendment To The Constitution" 22 November 2011. Web.18 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/fifth-amendment-constitution-47770>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Fifth Amendment To The Constitution", 22 November 2011, Accessed.18 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/fifth-amendment-constitution-47770