Fundamental Rights Term Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1296 words ( 4 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 4

Page 1 of 4

1950s, attempts to integrate fundamental human rights into EU treaties met with little success. Many commentators observe that the reason for the failure of these attempts is the fact that the EU was viewed primarily as an economic union, and as a result, the ECJ's role would be primarily in adjudicating economic and related trade disputes. Also, the ECJ would be charged with making determinations of EU/MS sovereignty where questions regarding the Eurozone's fundamental law and subsequent treaties are concerned. It follows then, that the development of a body of law for the securing and protection of fundamental rights across the EU's member states would have to wait until there was a deeper political and "psychological" union among Europe's citizens; and until this type of "union" took place among the EU's various polities, the ECJ was unable to legitimately and properly address questions of fundamental rights protections. Over time, the ECJ took the lead from adjudicating controversies surrounding the EU's "four freedoms" (the free movement of persons, goods, services and capital) to interpreting the EU's various treaties and their provisions in such a manner as to "carve out" so to speak, a judicial domain for fundamental human rights. The treatment of economic law, regulation and policy as a matter of human rights, and the development of 'general principles' of EU law begins in earnest in the 1960s, and subsequently until the Lisbon Treaty made the Charter of Fundamental Rights legally binding, the ECJ had established itself as the arbiter of European fundamental rights through its judicial decision making.

The first case of note in regard to laying the foundation for a European body of fundamental rights was the ECJ's 1969 decision in Stauder v. City of Ulm. Prior to this decision, no judicial, legislative or executive institution in the EU had explicitly addressed the theory that there may be fundamental human and political rights which cut across member states.

In Stauder, the ECJ held fundamental rights were recognized by EC law. In this case, which involved German welfare recipients, the ECJ allowed that there are "fundamental human rights enshrined in the General Principles of Community Law and protected by the court.

Stuck Writing Your "Fundamental Rights" Term Paper?

View All Our Example Fundamental Rights Term Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

" In other words, there are principles of human rights subsumed in EU general law that may supersede law mandated by the various member states' national constitutions. Though the Court did not go so far as to enunciate a theory whereby the ECJ becomes the sole arbiter of what constitutes a violation of fundamental human rights, it did however, state that these fundamental rights are core principles and that they have the ECJ's protection. But what are the general principles of Community law and how are they binding?

The general principles of community law are essentially "unwritten law" (much like the British constitution) that can be found in the member states' constitutions, or it can be determined by express provisions or interpretations of Treaty regulations and law. Perhaps the language from the United States' Supreme Court said it best in Griswold v Connecticut, when the U.S. high court held that the American constitution was surrounded by a "penumbra" of rights that could only be determined as cases and controversies unfolding over history made light of -- one can conceptualize EU general principles in much the same way. But the question regarding legitimacy remains. One complaint in regard to obeying the ECJ's decision making authority is that the Court's authority at this point in EU history was ultra vires, that is, there is no legal basis to follow the ECJ's decisions, and that when the court mandates a member nation to take action, the ECJ does so beyond the scope of its power. Though this question was problematic (and would be addressed in Articles 6&9 of the Maastricht Treaty and Articles 263&340 of the Lisbon Treaty,) the effect of Stauder was to lay a marker for future….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Civil Rights and Civil Liberties

Civil rights can be delineated as the very basic and fundamental rights to be free from unequal treatment, on the basis of particular attributes that are considered important, for instance gender, race, and also disability. The Bill of Rights protects all citizens of the nation against the infringement of their rights and liberties by any entity and even the state, as it is assured in the Constitution. One of the key civil rights discussed and debated in the United States in the present day encompasses the rights of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning community (LGBTQ) (Newton, 2014).… Continue Reading...

Impact of Federalism on Privacy Rights

constitutional debates on whether the concept has positive or negative impacts on certain fundamental rights. An example of an issue that has generated such debates is privacy rights i.e. whether some federal laws infringe on individuals right to privacy. This paper will examine the positive and negative impacts of federalism on privacy rights and identify the most significant impact. Positive Impact of Federalism on Privacy Rights The right to privacy is one of the core concepts of contemporary liberal constitutional ideas in the United States (Lim, 2015, p.415). Actually, the right to privacy is a principle that is embedded in the architecture of… Continue Reading...

Freedom of Speech and How It is Necessary

why I am writing about freedom of speech in relation to the reaction to Kaepernick is that the First Amendment encompasses the fundamental rights and freedoms fundamental to democracy. The goal of the paper is to explain the facts of the case through the lens of both ethics and constitutional law. Ultimately, I want to demonstrate to the audience why a democracy cannot function without freedom of speech. I also want to show why protesting something symbolic like the national anthem is precisely the definition of that fundamental freedom, and how it differs from hate speech. The specifics of the problem are as follows. First, Kaepernicks protest led to emotionally charged outcry… Continue Reading...

Beneficence Respect and Justice in Education Research

reason. Educational research can be scrutinized in the most streamlined way possible, while still protecting the most fundamental rights of individuals. The Belmont Report is a good starting point for considering the ethics of education research. Respect for persons, beneficence, and justice are the three core concepts outlined in the Belmont Report, according to Lopez-Alvarado (2017). There are several reasons why so much more attention is being paid to the Belmont Report and the ethics of education research in recent years. One is simply that it was impossible to maintain that education research is any different from any other research in the social sciences; from population sampling… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Fundamental Rights" (2012, May 16) Retrieved May 21, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/fundamental-rights-111614

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Fundamental Rights" 16 May 2012. Web.21 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/fundamental-rights-111614>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Fundamental Rights", 16 May 2012, Accessed.21 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/fundamental-rights-111614
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example