Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces Research Proposal

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1679 words ( 6 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 6



In this order of ideas then, he strives to come up with a theory that explains the construction of global networks, as well as the systems they use to grow and prosper. In order to make his case, Kendall looks at global structures constructed in various domains, including society and technology. He comes to the realization that global peace and order can only be achieved with the full cooperation and collaboration of all structures in the international system. Additionally, there must exist a will and a way in order for the mentioned goals to be achieved. While he recognizes that his arguments address a certain kind of economists and politicians who promoted the idea of a uniform and powerful globalization, he hopes that his points will the least make for an interesting reading.

Finally, in the last chapter of the book's first part, The Security of Governance, author Michael Dillon starts at the premise that there exists a direct connection between the three components of population, government and security. This conclusion was found throughout a previous study, which came to raise new questions that are answered in the current analysis.

Stuck Writing Your "Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces" Research Proposal?

View All Our Example Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces Research Proposal

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

In a perfect world, peace would be achieved through fruitful partnerships between private and public players and would ensure the safety of all populations and all classes. Yet, this is not the case and Dillon argues that while governmentality is the collection of cooperations and collaborations, it represents more of a "technological ontology that proceeds through reflexive epistemologies."

In other words, there is a direct connection between technology and ontology as they validate each other and support each other in reaching the pre-established goals. "Here the dialogical interplay of the ontological and the technological is in evidence. If it takes a metaphysic to imagine a technic, it takes a technic to realize a metaphysic. But even that rendition fails to do justice to the co-evolutionary dynamic that exists in the power relations between technology and ontology. This is a mutually disclosive relationship in which each seems propelled by independent dynamics as well: the technologist continuously to interrogate and refine systems, the ontologist….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Global Governmentality Governing International Spaces" (2009, June 23) Retrieved May 18, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/global-governmentality-governing-international-20998

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Global Governmentality Governing International Spaces" 23 June 2009. Web.18 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/global-governmentality-governing-international-20998>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Global Governmentality Governing International Spaces", 23 June 2009, Accessed.18 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/global-governmentality-governing-international-20998
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example