Goodbye to Another Unprincipled Democrat. Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 880 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 3

Millions of Americans were -- and still are -- without coverage. Fixating on abortion would have been like throwing a baby out with the bath water.

Second, the health care reform bill clearly allows for state insurers as well as private insurance companies to opt out of abortion coverage. Moreover, the essence of the health care reform bill is allowing all Americans to receive the coverage of their choice. That means that any person opposed to abortions can choose a health care plan that suits their needs. Stupak did not, as the editorial team suggests, vote for government-funded abortion. Stupak did vote for health care reform.

Another reason why the Washington Times editorial misses the mark is by slandering Stupak. There is simply no need to interject a personal attack into what is mainly a political issue. Instead, the editors of the Washington Times should use logic and not character assault to prove its case. Yes, Stupak's opinions were in "constant flux," as the Washington Times points out. This only proves that Stupak remained true to his ideals even though his opinions were contrary to those held by most other Democrats. Stupak tried to find ways of passing health care without sacrificing his anti-abortion political stance.

Stuck Writing Your "Goodbye to Another Unprincipled Democrat." Essay?

View All Our Example Goodbye to Another Unprincipled Democrat. Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

In the end, he did so. The Washington Post accuses Stupak of selling out his conscience "and the unborn." Actually, the Washington Post should not presume to know either the essence of Stupak's conscience or the "unborn."

The Washington Times then ironically offers Stupak too much credit even while slandering him. The editorial states, "he singlehandedly pushed Obamacare over the top for passage." This is incorrect. The Democratic Party joined forces in the interests of the common good. The Washington Post quotes Stupak as stating, "the bill would have passed anyway" without his support. Most Democrats had already made their decision to support health care and might not have needed Stupak's support anyway. If Stupak truly did not feel that the bill was the right measure for America, he would have voted "nay," as the editorial suggests. Stupak voted yes to healthcare reform because he viewed the bill as the best chance to remedy some of the social problems that plague the country. Stupak was doing his duty as a public servant, and in his retirement from politics should be commended for his courage.

Works.....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Goodbye To Another Unprincipled Democrat " (2010, April 11) Retrieved June 4, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/goodbye-another-unprincipled-democrat-12974

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Goodbye To Another Unprincipled Democrat " 11 April 2010. Web.4 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/goodbye-another-unprincipled-democrat-12974>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Goodbye To Another Unprincipled Democrat ", 11 April 2010, Accessed.4 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/goodbye-another-unprincipled-democrat-12974
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example