Governments Should Limit Their Interference in Market Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 650 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 5

Page 1 of 2

Governments should limit their interference in market progress.

The recent Presidential election was billed as a choice between two visions for America. Unfortunately for voters, there are many other visions that were not presented as viable options. If those options had been presented, voters may have chosen them. One such alternative political philosophy is libertarianism, which makes the case that government should interfere as little as possible in the daily lives of Americans. This is especially true in the economic realm -- whether it is regulation or tax handouts to powerful donor lobbies, the two big parties are equally culpable for creating needles burden that constricts the growth of the American economic engine.

Decentralization of government is a key concept. Manor (1999) notes that there has been a trend towards the decentralization of government worldwide. This trend is occurring because governments realize that decentralization can spur economic growth and alleviate rural poverty by placing more control over resources in the hands of the people.

Stuck Writing Your "Governments Should Limit Their Interference in Market" Essay?

View All Our Example Governments Should Limit Their Interference in Market Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written



One of the most significant issues is that governments are inherently prone to corruption. There is little fundamental difference between an official in the developing world asking for a bribe to sign paperwork and an official in Washington writing laws that favor his campaign donors. Corruption lies at the intersection of money and politics. Since politicians have access to and control of critical resources, corruption inevitably colors the governance process, creating barriers to free enterprise (Ehrlich & Lui, 1999).

Qian and Weingast (1997) argue that the state should act to preserve market incentives. This implies that the state should avoid creating regulation that restricts economic success, and should also avoid bailing out failures, as such bailouts skew market signals about behavior. When it is realized that both major political parties are responsible for the 'too big to fail' doctrine, the case for alternate views becomes clearer. Banks no longer have the incentive to manage their money well, and the result is….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Governments Should Limit Their Interference In Market" (2012, November 16) Retrieved May 1, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/governments-limit-interference-market-76479

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Governments Should Limit Their Interference In Market" 16 November 2012. Web.1 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/governments-limit-interference-market-76479>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Governments Should Limit Their Interference In Market", 16 November 2012, Accessed.1 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/governments-limit-interference-market-76479
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example