Griffin's Viewpoint Is Unclear. Tasioulas (2010) Summarized Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 839 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 3

Griffin's viewpoint is unclear. Tasioulas (2010) summarized Griffin's work, stating, "the upshot is that we are left in the dark as to why Griffin believes human rights properly quality as moral rights" (p. 651).

Ethical business leadership is not just good for corporations, but for everyone. According to Thompson, Thach & Morelli (2010), "society benefits when a business upholds high standards and society suffers when low standards are upheld" (p. 111).

The values of the Dow Chemical Company are at the core of its ethical behavior, and they can be seen in the way the company does business. As stated by Dow Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Andrew N. Liveris, "intentions are of course important, but we in business -- as in any other walk of life -- must be judged by our actions" (p. 35).

Business in the twenty-first century allows for greater transparency and flexibility, but with those come risks. As Paliwal (2006) points out, "it has become very crucial to look at how the new economy had brought greater complexity to the business environment changing the ethical dimension and raising new ethical issues" (p. 12).

5) There are issues beyond the scope of hospital ethics committees. As Hall (2000) points out, "hospital ethics committees are not really prepared to address questions of marketing, strategic planning, billing, employee relations, diversity programs, charity care, and the like" (p. 6).

Paraphrase:

1) "Does it really matter that Griffin provides no adequate account of why human rights are moral rights? Let me begin by suggesting two ways in which it does: (1) it renders his response to political theories of human rights incomplete, since many proponents of the latter take seriously the idea that human rights need to be distinguished from within the general class of moral rights, and (2) it lends an air of arbitrariness to his judgments about the scope of human rights morality, and its relation to justice and fairness, since they reflect undefended assumptions about moral rights in general.

Stuck Writing Your "Griffin's Viewpoint Is Unclear. Tasioulas (2010) Summarized" Essay?

View All Our Example Griffin's Viewpoint Is Unclear. Tasioulas (2010) Summarized Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

"

Paraphrase: Tasioulas believes that Griffin has not adequately supported his argument on why human rights are also moral rights. Tasioulas points out that proponents of political theories of human rights make a distinction with respect to moral rights. Moreover, Tasioulas argues, Griffin's failure to build a strong enough case leaves too much to interpretation with respect to moral and human rights as related to fairness and justice.

2) "Benefits from the effects of ethical leaders come in a variety of forms, both direct and indirect.….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Griffin's Viewpoint Is Unclear Tasioulas 2010 Summarized" (2013, May 04) Retrieved May 21, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/griffin-viewpoint-unclear-tasioulas-2010-100166

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Griffin's Viewpoint Is Unclear Tasioulas 2010 Summarized" 04 May 2013. Web.21 May. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/griffin-viewpoint-unclear-tasioulas-2010-100166>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Griffin's Viewpoint Is Unclear Tasioulas 2010 Summarized", 04 May 2013, Accessed.21 May. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/griffin-viewpoint-unclear-tasioulas-2010-100166
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example