Hazardous Materials Handling Case Study

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 998 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 3

Page 1 of 3

1984 when a toluene storage tank at a bulk petroleum storage facility exploded while firefighters were trying to get to an low-skill worker that was trapped inside said tank. The author of this report will assess the factors involved, what could be done to prevent a recurrence of such an incident, what changes should be made for the same reasons, the regulations or standards involved and so forth. The overall idea behind what the storage facility was trying to do made at least some sense but the execution of adding the portal as well as the way in which the extrication was attempted was shoddy to say the least. Neither of the two people had to die but it happened for two distinct reasons and both pertain to gross negligence on the part of the parties involved.

Analysis

The sheer stupidity and negligence that happened in this case was abysmally bad, especially on the part of the manager that somehow convinced the uneducated worker to engage in a job that led to this death. Further, that death would have almost certainly happened whether or not the tank exploded. However, it did explode in large part because the spray down was not done to completion and this permitted sparks to spark an explosion. Anyhow, the different mistakes that were made along the way will be covered now. First, if there was not a realistic or safe way to add a portal to the tank, a new tank should have been bought.

Stuck Writing Your "Hazardous Materials Handling" Case Study?

View All Our Example Hazardous Materials Handling Case Study

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

However, the storage facility did do some due diligence and it was established that it could be done but it had to be done the right way. This included completely emptying and cleaning out the tank before doing any work to it. After all, adding the portal when there is a flammable sludge or substance on the surface (inside or out) is less than wise. This is something the firefighters learned and realized the hard way (CDC, 2015).

Next up is the fact that the worker entered the tank during a "dry run" when the tank itself and the way in which it was entered was not safe. While it is perhaps useful to have the SCBA system in place, it does not serve much purpose if the tank cannot be worn and fully active as the tank is being entered. Toluene is extremely nasty stuff. In addition to being flammable, it is extremely toxic in terms of what its fumes can do to someone. Indeed, it is often intentionally huffed and breathed in by drug addicts but in much smaller amounts. It is no surprise that the worker become unresponsive because he was either high as a kite and/or he was suffocating due to the lack of ventilation in the tank. What probably happened is that the….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Hazardous Materials Handling" (2015, March 27) Retrieved June 4, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/hazardous-materials-handling-2149329

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Hazardous Materials Handling" 27 March 2015. Web.4 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/hazardous-materials-handling-2149329>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Hazardous Materials Handling", 27 March 2015, Accessed.4 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/hazardous-materials-handling-2149329
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example