Hospice Care Research Paper

Total Length: 2469 words ( 8 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 4

Page 1 of 8

Hospice Care and Catholic Ethics

Is Hospice care consistent with Catholic bioethics? Chapple, in her discussion of the topic "Hospice care" in Catholic health care ethics, argues that ultimately the answer is yes, but she acknowledges that there are levels of difficulty in answering the question (Chapple 2009). The ethics of Hospice care present us with a complicated question, insofar as Catholic teachings on end-of-life care have at times provoked public controversy -- the most noteworthy example within recent memory was the Congressional and Presidential intervention in Terri Schiavo case, which brought Catholic teachings about medical intervention at the end of life into national debate and discussion. The Schiavo case was about a straightforward case of euthanasia, and to a certain degree Catholic teachings about hospice care resemble (in their logic about the nature and purpose of human life and death) the Catholic teachings about larger end-of-life issues. The ultimate lesson may be that Hospice care is consistent with Catholic ethical teaching provided it does not stray into areas which are clearly forbidden under that teaching, such as assisted suicide or euthanasia. In terms of ethical teaching, the Fifth Commandment is not easily or persuasively defined away.

For a start we must define precisely what Hospice care entails. Hospice is only an option for those who are terminally ill, and who are no longer determined to pursue active treatment of the illness. To some extent, then, Hospice may sound like a form of assisted suicide -- what the patient will be dying from is the terminal illness itself, untreated. For this reason we must ask whether Hospice in some way represents a withholding of certain necessary medical treatments, and if it is in any way a sin it must be one of omission rather than commission, not what a person does so much as what a person fails to do. To a certain degree, then, we may recall the problems of the Terri Schiavo case, which popularized the notion that Catholic teaching required keeping end-of-life patients alive by any means necessary: of course Schiavo would not have been a candidate for hospice care, as she was in a persistent vegetative state for a number of years, and doctors were not inclined to think a miraculous cure for Schiavo would be likely. But Schiavo was kept alive with relative ease, by means of a feeding tube -- and it is true that the Catholic church insists upon an ethical obligation to provide a bare minimum of care, to the level of a hospital bed and a feeding tube. It is worth noting that the Catechism of the Catholic Church actually distinguishes here between "ordinary means" of keeping another person alive (food, water, medical care) and the "extraordinary." To withhold the "extraordinary" is not necessarily a violation of church teachings, according to the Catechism itself:

2278. Discontinuing medical procedures that are burdensome, dangerous, extraordinary, or disproportionate to the expected outcome can be legitimate; it is the refusal of "over-zealous" treatment. Here one does not will to cause death; one's inability to impede it is merely accepted. The decisions should be made by the patient if he is competent and able or, if not, by those legally entitled to act for the patient, whose reasonable will and legitimate interests must always be respected. (Catechism, n.p.)

The distinction between Hospice care and straightforward euthanasia is thus captured in a phrase: in Hospice care "one does not will to cause death" but obviously the removal of the feeding tube from Terri Schiavo was intended for no other purpose than to cause death. But this becomes, then, the ethical sticking-point for questions of Hospice care within specifically Catholic teaching. It is worth noting that the Catechism goes on to note that "palliative care is a special form of disinterested charity. As such it should be encouraged." (Catechism 2279). If Hospice care consists of nothing but palliative care, then, it should be seen as not merely permissible but praiseworthy, according to the Church itself.

To a certain degree, then, we can argue that Catholic teaching on Hospice is automatically defined by means of what sort of patients would be considered eligible for Hospice care ethically under Catholic standards. Terri Schiavo's feeding tube was, of course, not particularly burdensome or dangerous or extraordinary, and it served its function of preventing Terri Schiavo from starving to death. The Catholic standards of care therefore insisted upon the maintenance of Schiavo's feeding tube as ethically necessary for end of life standards of care -- the patient is being fed. But what if the only care available to stop the progress of a disease was dangerous, or experimental -- or what if no adequate care actually exists? This is a situation quite common with different types of cancer, for example: there are not many effective medications to combat stage four adenocarcinoma of the lung, and a cancer as far advanced as stage four is basically going to require such high dosage of chemotherapy to combat in any meaningful way that the cure may very well kill the patient sooner than the disease.
This is what the Catechism has in mind when it absolves the patient from any ethical necessity to pursue "extraordinary means" to stay alive. But as Chapple notes, and other proponents of Hospice care have argued, Hospice is not the withholding or abandoning of medical care, because it is closer to a redirection of the goal of medical care for that patient. Just because Hospice no longer has as its goal curing the illness does not mean that Hospice stops offering care to the patient -- instead, the care has become palliative, intended to improve the quality of life for the patient, with goals like reduction of pain and retention of mobility.

Yet we have not entirely finished with the concept of Hospice care as a kind of means of procuring death on the part of the patient. Obviously Catholic ethics are no more permissive toward suicide than they are toward relieving us of our moral obligation to provide our fellows with the basic minimum required to sustain life and health -- although a certain amount of ambiguity is acknowledged by the Catechism as unavoidable in its discussion of the good intentions (which may nevertheless pave a road to hell) on the part of those who assist another in suicide "in order to eliminate suffering." And to a certain degree, this also lingers on in a popular notion of Hospice care as entailing painkillers in gradually increasing dosage, perhaps even pushed to the level of overdose -- this is, of course, a myth, but one which is remarkably persistent even among medical people. It is worth noting, however, that this is based on a fundamental misconception about the nature and purpose of Hospice care. The counterintuitive-sounding truth was expressed with remarkable candor by Dr. Atul Gawande, American physician and medical correspondent for the New Yorker magazine. Gawande confesses that, even as a doctor, he had little idea of what results hospice care actually offered:

Like many people, I had believed that hospice care hastens death, because patients forgo hospital treatments and are allowed high-dose narcotics to combat pain. But studies suggest otherwise. In one, researchers followed 4,493 Medicare patients with either terminal cancer or congestive heart failure. They found no difference in survival time between hospice and non-hospice patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer, and colon cancer. Curiously, hospice care seemed to extend survival for some patients; those with pancreatic cancer gained an average of three weeks, those with lung cancer gained six weeks, and those with congestive heart failure gained three months. The lesson seems almost Zen: you live longer only when you stop trying to live longer. (Gawande 2010)

The paradox of this is remarkably consistent with the Catholic Church's teaching that palliative care is governed by a special sort of grace that covers unusual acts of charity -- to a certain extent, it sounds as though palliative care is itself capable of certain minor miracles, perhaps because its concentration on the patient's quality of life results in an increase of the patient's actual will to live. But at the same time, the notion that something is being neglected that could keep the patient alive is actually irrelevant to the question of Hospice care -- Hospice care is only warranted if the medical care that can keep the patient alive can no longer be described as "ordinary means." When Pope John Paul II offered personal remarks on the subject of Hospice care in 2004, this was precisely what he emphasized -- he thought it worth remarking that the Church's teaching never deviates broadly from the reasonable medical advice: "Indeed the object of the decision on whether to begin or to continue a treatment has nothing to do with the value of the patient's life, but rather with whether such medical intervention is beneficial for the patient." (John Paul II, 6) For John Paul II, in other words, the….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Planning for End of Life Care

complex ethical dilemmas that are important considerations in palliative and hospice care are attributed to the fact that the creation of social support networks has personal and community elements. As a result, social workers should undertake several measures to address these ethical dilemmas and help create meaningful social support networks for elderly individuals facing the end of their lives. Some of these vital measures in palliative and hospice care include negotiating the complex social terrain of family conflicts, dealing with social isolation, and addressing social inequality (Watts, 2013). Continue Reading...

UPSA Members and LTC Choices

stage of an illness. Palliative care can be offered simultaneously with remedial/therapeutic treatment (GetPallicativeCare.org, 2019). · Hospice Care Hospice care is the type of care designed to offer support to the category of people who are battling terminal illnesses (MedicineNet, 2018). The focus of hospice care is to offer quality life and comfort to the patient instead of trying to cure the terminal illness (MedicineNet, 2018). The objective is to make it possible for patients to enjoy some comfort and get some pain relief in order to make it possible for them to live each day as comfortably and as fully as possible (WebMD, n.d.). Hospice… Continue Reading...

Grieving Process and Models

loved ones is Kubler-Ross grieving model. Social workers generally handle many issues and responsibilities in hospice care including family end-of-life care and helping individuals cope with the loss of a loved one. Kubler-Ross grieving model is suitable for a hospice environment since it can be utilized as part of family end-of-life education. The first step in applying this model would entail helping family members go through the denial stage since denial is a functional aspect of grieving since it assists in making the loss relatively easy (Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman, 2016). During this process, I will provide a platform for the individuals to direct their anger… Continue Reading...

Improving Health Welfare for a Vulnerable Population Community

There is evidence in innovative health programs whose outcomes are Hospice care with increased patient and caregiver satisfaction costs lower than the conventional care; programs with community-based care reduces the severity of symptoms and results in a rapid functioning; for the frail elderly, it results in improved satisfaction; Patient empowerment, especially with the frail elderly and disabled adults, brings satisfaction and knowledge about their care; for the mentally ill, it lowers the rate of homelessness and for patients with diabetes or congestive heart failure, it decreases the morbidity. Usually, the beneficial effects were limited to the duration of the intervention… Continue Reading...

St Elizabeths Organizational Structure and Mission

needs of elderly adults and persons with disabilities, spanning from long-term care, adult daycare, hospice care, and other supportive services such as assistance for elders experiencing abuse at the hands of their caregivers. An organic rather than a bureaucratic structure is needed because there is often overlap between the different services required by patients. Some patients may begin with a need for treatment of a specific ailment like a fall in rehabilitative care services, but then later need supportive therapy in the form of adult daycare. As patients transition between different components of the organization, dialogue between the various providers is helpful to ensure… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Hospice Care" (2013, March 19) Retrieved May 18, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/hospice-care-102638

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Hospice Care" 19 March 2013. Web.18 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/hospice-care-102638>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Hospice Care", 19 March 2013, Accessed.18 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/hospice-care-102638