Interviews and Interrogation Interview and Interrogation According Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 684 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 2

Interviews and Interrogation

Interview and Interrogation

According to Borum, Gelles and Kleinman (2009) law enforcement interrogators historically have made a distinction between the concepts of an interview and an interrogation. One commonly understood difference is that the purpose of an interview is to gather information, whereas the primary purpose of an interrogation is to garner a confession from a suspect who is presumed to be guilty.

Another difference (Inbau, 2001) involves the presence or absence of an accusation during the interaction. An interview is non-accusatory. During an interview, the investigator is encouraged to adopt a neutral and objective attitude and is instructed not to accuse the subject of wrongdoing. By contrast, an interrogation is accusatory. The interrogator will often begin an interrogation by directly accusing the suspect of committing the crime that is under investigation, and the entire interaction will revolve around that accusation.

Inbau (2001) notes the goals of the two processes are different. The primary goal of an interview is to gather information that is relevant to the investigation.

Stuck Writing Your "Interviews and Interrogation Interview and Interrogation According" Essay?

View All Our Example Interviews and Interrogation Interview and Interrogation According Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

This information includes the who, what, when, where, why, and how of any criminal investigation and can also involve assessing the credibility of the source of the information. The goal of an interrogation is not to gather basic information regarding a crime and a suspect's potential culpability but to learn the truth about the details of the crime from someone who is suspected of committing the crime. This truth will often involve the confession of the suspect who is interrogated.

Another distinction between interviews and interrogations is that interviews tend to be flexible and free flowing interactions, whereas interrogations are generally more tightly structured. An interview is a dialogue between the investigator and the subject. It is a question and answer session in which both parties may ask questions and give answers. The investigator normally has several key points that he or she wants to cover, but these points may be altered as the dialogue unfolds. In contrast, an interrogation involves active persuasion on the part of the interrogator. As.....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Interviews And Interrogation Interview And Interrogation According" (2011, May 19) Retrieved June 4, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/interviews-interrogation-interview-interrogation-50976

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Interviews And Interrogation Interview And Interrogation According" 19 May 2011. Web.4 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/interviews-interrogation-interview-interrogation-50976>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Interviews And Interrogation Interview And Interrogation According", 19 May 2011, Accessed.4 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/interviews-interrogation-interview-interrogation-50976
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example