Joint Venture and Lg

Total Length: 2042 words ( 7 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 6

Page 1 of 7

Joint Venture Partner for HP Inc.

Candidate Companies

LG

Daewoo

Samsung

Assessment of Candidate Companies

LG

Daewoo

Samsung

Investment Recommendation

Team Fab Five have recommended that HP target South Korea for an acquisition. The acquisition should be undertaken as joint venture with a suitable partner. To determine the most suitable partner, potential joint venture collaborators must first be identified, and HP should determine what they would like to gain from the alliance, which will be used as a basis for assessment of the potential partners.

HP is a well-known leading player in the international markets focusing on personal computers, printers, and related hardware (HP Inc., 2016; Kitagawa, Jump, & Lam, 2016). The firm emerged in 2015 following the split of HP in 2015 (Kitagawa et al., 2016). The firm is now seeking to expand and increase its foot print, but has suffered as a result of the slow economy, this is reflected in the announcement that HP are expecting planning to cut between 3-4,000 jobs over the next three years, due to sluggish sales (Reuters, 2016). Dion Weisler, the CEO has stated that the firm expects condition to remain uncertain and markets volatile. In addition, the firm has a clear focus on the core items of personal computers and printers.

When identifying and assessing potential joint-venture partners, the candidates should have characteristics, resources, and/or core competencies which are complementary to the competencies and resources held by the initiating firm (Mintzberg, Ahlstrand, & Lampel, 2008). Therefore, it is assumed in this paper that the desired to expand, strategy as defined by, is a joint venture partner (JV) should have a high level of knowledge regarding the potential new market. As the organisation has also suffered financially, it would be desirable for the joint venture partners not only to bring additional financial resources, but demonstrate a degree of financial stability.

2. Candidate Companies

Three potential candidates have been identified; LG, Dahlia, and Samsung.

2.1 LG

LG, previously known as Lucky-Goldstar, is a publicly listed firm, which had a turnover of U.S. $48.06 billion in 2015 (Statista, 2016). The firm has highly diversified operations, while known predominantly for its presence in electronic technology markets internationally, with products as wide-ranging as television and DVD players, household white goods, through to telecommunications equipment. In 2016, LG is the third-largest OEM smartphone manufacturer supplying the U.S., supply 9.8% of all smartphones in the country, trailing behind Apple and Samsung (comScore, 2016).
However, the diversification goes beyond product within the electronics/technology markets, with the company involved in the manufacture of additional products such as soap, laundry detergents and toothpaste, created and sold for the South Korean market (LG, 2016). The firm undertakes manufacture in-house, and has outsourcing agreements (LG, 2016)

The financial position of the firm appears viable, with the firms showing profit over the last three years, but this profit was constrained in 2015, to a net profit margin (before tax) of 0.44%, with the parent company making a loss in 2015 (LG, 2016). Notably, the company is also facing challenges, as the revenues in 2015 have from the previous figure of $50.21 billion in 2014 (Statista, 2016).

2.2 Daewoo

Daewoo is a large multinational conglomerate made up of 20 different divisions, operating under an umbrella structure (Daewoo, 2016). The different firms are listed separately as public listed firms (Morning Star, 2016). The JV may be undertaken with Daewoo Electronic Components, where there is a high level of common interest. This business unit had a turnover of KRW million 46,263 in 2015, with a profit margin of 2.32%, which has increased to 4.18% in the second quarter of 2016 (Google Finance, 2016).

Daewoo, which has faced bankruptcy in the past, is now more highly diversified than LG, with Daewoo Electronic being the largest company (Daewoo, 2016). The main thrust of the business currently appear to be on other areas, mainly gas, oil and energy, including investments in Myanmar, with the firm criticised for dealing with a political regime which a poor human rights record (Kyung-min, 2016)

2.3 Samsung

Samsung, similar to Daewoo, is a multinational conglomerate, made up of multiple subsidiaries (Samsung, 2016). The group is highly diversified with interests in areas such as chemicals, construction, hospitality, transportation, as well as electronics and ICT industries (Samsung, 2016). In 2015 the firm had a total turnover of KRW 200,653 million, and a profit margin of 12.93% (Samsung, 2016).

Samsung is well-known, but also has a degree of controversy. Between 2012 and 2015 Samsung have been accused of child labour abuses (Murgia, 2016). This has included turning a blind eye to upstream suppliers using child labour (Murgia, 2016). The firm has also faced multiple legal suits, including price fixing as part of a cartel seeking to control DRAM prices (Harrison Pensa, 2015), has had.....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Joint Venture And Lg" (2016, November 20) Retrieved May 3, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/joint-venture-lg-2163104

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Joint Venture And Lg" 20 November 2016. Web.3 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/joint-venture-lg-2163104>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Joint Venture And Lg", 20 November 2016, Accessed.3 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/joint-venture-lg-2163104