Judicial Agenda of President Franklin Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1383 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 5

Page 1 of 5

If Chief Justice Hughes and his five aged associates had chosen to remain, the membership of the court would have been enlarged from nine to fifteen" (Pusey 1995).

A small group of constitutional lawyers advised Roosevelt in the construction of the bill, assuring him that the Democratic majority in both Houses of Congress would pass it. When Roosevelt introduced the bill, Roosevelt used the euphemism of judicial 'reform' rather than said it was an attempt to circumvent the recent rulings of the Supreme Court. He framed his plan as a way of relieving the pressures of overcrowded court dockets. However, some of the phrases he used made his feelings clear, namely his reference to the problems of lifetime appointments, or "aged or infirm judges," (Menaker 2008).

When he spoke of justices of advanced ages, the President was obviously speaking of his opponents on the Court, the so-called anti-government Four Horsemen of the New Deal Apocalypse, all over the age of seventy: Justices Butler, McReynolds, Sutherland and Van Devanter. Roosevelt said older men often lack "mental or physical vigor" which "leads men to avoid an examination of complicated and changed conditions" (Menaker 2008). He added: "older men, assuming that the scene is the same as it was in the past, cease to explore or inquire into the present or the future" (Menaker 2008). Hence, the need to reduce the influence of old judges.

The Senate hearings on the Bill, particularly after the testimony of Chief Justice Hughes about how an enlarged court would be more unwieldy and inefficient, roused the ire of both legislators and the public against Roosevelt's plan, especially after Chief Justice Hughes showed that the court's docket was not overcrowded. Yet while the doomed bill was debated, the Supreme Court suddenly decided that their previous conclusion in the New York minimum-wage case had been wrong.

Stuck Writing Your "Judicial Agenda of President Franklin" Essay?

View All Our Example Judicial Agenda of President Franklin Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

In December of 1936, the Court voted four-to-four to uphold a similar Washington minimum-age law and to reverse its previous decision. Roosevelt had said he wanted his new justices to be more responsive to the needs of the public. While the justices decried this on principle, in action they began to move to support Roosevelt's desire for change. On April 12 the Court upheld the National Labor Relations Act and confirmed the power of Congress to regulate industrial relations having a direct impact on interstate commerce. When a few weeks later the Senate Judiciary Committee rejected the Roosevelt's 'packing the Court' legislation, the Court validated the constitutionality of Social Security (Pusey 1958).

To speak of Roosevelt's judicial philosophy may be somewhat inaccurate -- Roosevelt was a legislator, a doer, a politician by instinct, not a constitutional philosopher. He was clearly angered by the unresponsiveness of an unelected body of men to the needs of the country, and its inflexibility to the needs of the nation. He thought the Supreme Court should serve the people, rather than be unresponsive to the popular will. He feared the influence of old men, and old men growing insulated to social problems. The Constitution was a flexible document, not dogma, and Roosevelt saw no reason for the elected chief executive not to have superior influence and insight than old justices. As noble as Roosevelt's intentions may have been, even liberal defenders of the New Deal might argue that Roosevelt type of executive confidence, although thwarted, would later spur other presidents on to even more egregious use of their powers.

Works.....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Judicial Agenda Of President Franklin" (2009, March 06) Retrieved June 6, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/judicial-agenda-president-franklin-24229

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Judicial Agenda Of President Franklin" 06 March 2009. Web.6 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/judicial-agenda-president-franklin-24229>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Judicial Agenda Of President Franklin", 06 March 2009, Accessed.6 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/judicial-agenda-president-franklin-24229
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example