Judicial Process Discussion Chapter

Total Length: 416 words ( 1 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Sentencing Philosophies

The four sentencing philosophies of the American Criminal Justice System are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation and incapacitation. Each is grounded in a set of beliefs that address the relationship between the severity of a crime and the purpose of the sentence. Retribution is based on the belief that the sentence should be imposed according to the severity of the crime committed. A common expression used to describe this philosophy is, "an eye for an eye." According to this philosophy, no other circumstances, such as the influence of a psychological illness, are considered in the sentencing. Deterrence is based on the belief that fear of further punishment will deter the offender and other potential offenders from committing the crime.
Prison sentences, or a heavy fine, are examples of sentences that apply to this philosophy, which is essentially grounded in fear. Rehabilitation believes that fixing the causes of the offense, that is the specific problems of the offender, will reduce the risk of future crimes. The sentence under this philosophy would be probation, individualized therapy and community service orders. Finally, the philosophy of incapacitation is based on the most logical conclusion. An offender is made incapable of committing further crime if he is sentenced to a long prison sentence.….....

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


Related Essays

Judicial Process Alternative Dispute Resolution ADR

Why have so many jurisdictions turned to forms of ADR to supplement the judicial process? Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is a procedure of dispute resolution that functions as a means of utilizing an external party for settling disagreements between two different parties. In the contemporary, ADR has come to be extensive and espoused by numerous states and expanses in the United States. Notably, in recent times, a number of courts have necessitated that a number of parties employ ADR to settle the presented cases. In the event that the process of mediation of alternative dispute resolution fails to come to an amicable agreement,… Continue Reading...

Military Tribunals or Federal Courts Terrorism

were to be tried in a civilian court, which skews the judicial process in favor of the prosecution. The military tribunal approach has enabled the indefinite detention of terrorist suspects at Guantanamo (Greenberg, 2017). Ironically, though, the numbers do not reflect the presumed superiority of military tribunals to convict terrorist suspects. While only eight terrorist suspects have been convicted in military trials, almost seven hundred have been convicted in… Continue Reading...

sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Judicial Process" (2011, October 18) Retrieved June 13, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/judicial-process-116706

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Judicial Process" 18 October 2011. Web.13 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/judicial-process-116706>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Judicial Process", 18 October 2011, Accessed.13 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/judicial-process-116706