Judicial Review of Ledbetter V. Thesis

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1671 words ( 6 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 6

..making each withdrawal liability payment when due under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act 29 U.S.C. Section 1381(a)." (Nager, et al., 2006; citing Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. Of Cal., Inc. 522 U.S. 192, 208 (1997). The respondent further notes that in relation to each antitrust law a new violation is constituted by each "unlawfully high priced sale" since that sale is a "separate, single act" in violation of the Sherman Act, Klehr v. a.O. Smith Corp., 521 U.S. 170, 189 (1997).

IV. ANALYSIS

The petitioner in this case Ledbetter, states that that question is "...whether payment of an intentionally disparate wages constitutes a present violation of Title VII," and while it is unfortunate that just as in this case, a company can practice pay discrimination over so many years and in such increments that may not be conceived as discriminatory, the fact remains that there is a specific time-period requirement for filing of such claims as are made by the petitioner in this particular case.

Because the decision in the case of Bazemore v. Friday was concerned with the intentional discrimination which occurred prior to Title VII being enacted and in Ledbetter v. Goodyear, the question rests on an entirely different issue, or the issue of intentional discrimination which falls outside of the 180 time-period requirement for filing of intentional discrimination claims, Bazemore v.

Stuck Writing Your "Judicial Review of Ledbetter V." Thesis?

View All Our Example Judicial Review of Ledbetter V. Thesis

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Friday was not found by the court to be applicable or relevant in Ledbetter v. Goodyear and it is the opinion of this writer that there would be no effective challenge to this decision and that this decision is one of a sound nature and is one that falls within the realm of case law and that no existing law supports the claim of the petitioner in this matter relating to intentional discrimination claims that were not filed in a timely manner.

Russell, Kevin K. et al. (2006) Reply Brief for the Petitioner in the case of Lilly M. Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Inc. 14 Nov 2006.

Bazemore v. Friday, 478 U.S. 385, 395 (1986)

Nager, Glen D., et al. (2006) Brief for Respondent on Writ of Certiorari….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Judicial Review Of Ledbetter V " (2008, August 27) Retrieved July 7, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/judicial-review-ledbetter-28365

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Judicial Review Of Ledbetter V " 27 August 2008. Web.7 July. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/judicial-review-ledbetter-28365>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Judicial Review Of Ledbetter V ", 27 August 2008, Accessed.7 July. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/judicial-review-ledbetter-28365
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example