Justice: Theories Philosophers and Thinkers Have Proposed Term Paper

Total Length: 914 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 1+

Page 1 of 3

Justice: Theories

Philosophers and thinkers have proposed many theories of justice and while some of them appear to be based on sound premise, there are others that completely denounced logic. In his book, The Republic, Plato has introduced us to various viewpoints on justice concluding with Socrates' philosophy of the same. The one prevalent view of justice in Plato's days was introduced by Cephalus. He believed that justice meant always telling the truth and repaying what is given. Repaying what is given is a highly ambiguous view and one that needs to be analyzed closely. If one always repaid what he/she was given would that mean he is being just. For example, if a friend does me a favor and I repay it, then that is certainly a just act. Similarly if a friend hurts me or stabs me in the back, repaying the same would also constitute justice. So far it sounds logical but justice is a virtue. It should therefore be positive in nature. Hurting someone back doesn't really make sense because it violates the principles of friendship. Wouldn't it be better if I chose to forgive my friend and thus won him back? Thus while the philosophy is based on logic, it betrays the very essence of justice.

Thrasymachus proposed another theory of justice. According to him, justice was the law of the stronger. It meant that laws must always be formulated to protect the stronger.

Stuck Writing Your "Justice: Theories Philosophers and Thinkers Have Proposed" Term Paper?

This philosophy is not even based on logic and the very premise of the concept is flawed. It must be made clear here that it is the weak who needs protection of the law, stronger or influential people can protect themselves through other means as well. "Thus, for Thrasymachus justice means personal interest of the ruling group in any state or we can further define it as "another's good." Laws are made by the ruling party in its own interest. Those who violate such laws are punished because violation of such laws is treated as violation of justice." (1) This view was severely criticized by Socrates who maintained that "just as a physician studies and exercises his power not in his interest but in the interest of a patient, the Government of any kind shall do what is good for the people for whom it exercises its art." (1) I agree and also disagree with Socrates here. Stronger may always try to manipulate the justice system but the structure of society and the system of checks and balances doesn't allow for this. Justice by its very definition means fairness and laws cannot be fair if they only benefit the strong. For example, minimum wage laws in the country are not created to benefit the stronger people, they are….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Justice Theories Philosophers And Thinkers Have Proposed" (2005, February 08) Retrieved July 1, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/justice-theories-philosophers-thinkers-61670

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Justice Theories Philosophers And Thinkers Have Proposed" 08 February 2005. Web.1 July. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/justice-theories-philosophers-thinkers-61670>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Justice Theories Philosophers And Thinkers Have Proposed", 08 February 2005, Accessed.1 July. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/justice-theories-philosophers-thinkers-61670