Kant Mill and Aristotle Essay

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 1007 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 3

Ethical Theory

The author of this report has been asked to answer several questions about noted ethicists and philosophers. There will also be coverage of both of those as they pertain to happiness, good, evil and utilitarianism. The people that will be covered in these answers include Mill and Kant. When it comes to Mill, there will be a definition of happiness as well as what is meant by something or someone being intrinsically good or evil. As it relates to Kant, there will be the question of whether it is ever morally acceptable under Kantian ethics to lie to patients so as to not cause them psychological harm. Finally, there will be the question of whether it is practical or possible to combine utilitarianism and ethics of care. While some ethical questions about healthcare are cut and dry and have a fairly to very obvious answer, there are most certainly shades of gray that must be toiled and dealt with.

Questions Answered

When it comes to the definition of happiness, there multiple layers to the answer but they are fairly distinct when read from the work and assertions of Mill. First, Mill aligns with Aristotle on the same subject when he says that happiness requires activities that are specific to humans. For example, driving a car might bring happiness to someone and that would work under the Mill/Aristotle viewpoint as only humans can drive cars. Mill expanded on that answer by saying that humans must have faculties and appetites that are clearly superior to that of other animals.

Stuck Writing Your "Kant Mill and Aristotle" Essay?

View All Our Example Kant Mill and Aristotle Essay

Have A Custom Example Essay Written

Mill believed in all of this based on main thing, which Aristotle happened to agree with. Both men suggested that only humans can live according to reason. Indeed, other animals live according to instinct and much more basic feelings that do not include any sophisticated logic. Instead, animals really only worry about meeting their needs and defending their brethren (sometimes) but logic and reason do not enter the equation. Animals react without a lot of consideration and certainly no depth of morality or reason (Senior, 2012). When it comes to matters that are intrinsically good or bad, Mill is very clear on the former. He notes that pleasure is the only thing that is intrinsically good (Krieger, 2016). When it comes to things that are intrinsically bad, Mill was very much a proponent of the work of Plato and this would indicate that while pleasure is intrinsically good, pain would be the opposite and would be intrinsically bad (Zimmerman, 2002).

As far as whether a healthcare provider should lie so as to prevent psychological harm, Kantians would most certainly say that this would be wrong even if the intentions were good. Kant held that morality is based on….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Kant Mill And Aristotle" (2016, February 04) Retrieved May 16, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/kant-mill-aristotle-2156138

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Kant Mill And Aristotle" 04 February 2016. Web.16 May. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/kant-mill-aristotle-2156138>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Kant Mill And Aristotle", 04 February 2016, Accessed.16 May. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/kant-mill-aristotle-2156138
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example