Kantian and Utilitarian Term Paper

Total Length: 403 words ( 1 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Kant's Theory Of Retribution

Those who act criminally are required by the community to receive a punishment for those acts.

To Kant, retribution is justified when it is an exact compensation for the wrong another person has done. Inappropriate punishment, on the other hand, is something which is arbitrary and more often than not, completely unrelated to the actual effect of the crime. Therefore, it is morally unjustifiable to punish a person, while eye for an eye retribution, while it causes suffering, is justifiable because the harm done is repaid with an exact and related harm.

When it comes to the death penalty, Kant would argue that such a penalty is justifiable only when it is used to redress the taking of a life.

The utilitarian framework can be used to evaluate the legitimacy of the death penalty from the point-of-view of net gain; does the punishment result in a net positive gain for the rest of the community.


Both positions have strengths and weaknesses when applied to capital punishment.

Kant's doctrine of retribution makes it very clear that when a person has committed a crime, against property or a person, the only correct punishment is one that exacts the very….....

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Kantian And Utilitarian" (2002, November 18) Retrieved June 5, 2026, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/kantian-utilitarian-139073

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Kantian And Utilitarian" 18 November 2002. Web.5 June. 2026. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/kantian-utilitarian-139073>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Kantian And Utilitarian", 18 November 2002, Accessed.5 June. 2026,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/kantian-utilitarian-139073